How do you find the probabilities for an anharmonic quantum oscillator state?

damarkk
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Find the probability for all possible unperturbed states ##| n\rangle## for an harmonic oscillator with perturbation ##V(x)=\alpha x^3##
Relevant Equations
##x##, ##p##.
I have one tremendous doubt about it.


On ##t=0## the state of the oscillator is ##| \Psi (t) \rangle = | 1 \rangle ##. The perturbation is ##V(x)=\alpha x^3 = \alpha (\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega})^{3/2} (a+a^{\dagger})^3 = \gamma (a^3+3Na+3Na^{\dagger} + 3a + (a^{\dagger})^3)##.

The only possible other states are ##|0 \rangle##, ##| 2\rangle##, ##|4\rangle##. The state corrected on the first order is:

##|\Psi \rangle = |1 \rangle + c_0|0 \rangle + c_2|2 \rangle + c_4|4\rangle##

where ##c_k = \langle k| V(x) | 1 \rangle ##.


What are the probability to find the oscillator in a generic state ##|n \rangle##?


My answer is ##P_k = |c_k|^2##, but for k=1 we have ##P_1 = 1##. This is not possible I think. On the other hand, I suppose that ##P_1 = 1-P_0 - P_2- P_4 = 1-|c_0|^2-|c_2|^2-|c_4|^2##, but how can I show this? The coefficient of ##| 1\rangle## is 1. This is my question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
damarkk said:
Homework Statement: Find the probability for all possible unperturbed states ##| n\rangle## for an harmonic oscillator with perturbation ##V(x)=\alpha x^3##
Relevant Equations: ##x##, ##p##.

On ##t=0## the state of the oscillator is ##| \Psi (t) \rangle = | 1 \rangle ##.
How do you know the state is ##|1\rangle## at ##t = 0##? This was not given in the homework statement as given. Always provide the full homework statement.

I don't understand "##x##, ##p##" for your Relevant Equations.
damarkk said:
The perturbation is ##V(x)=\alpha x^3 = \alpha (\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega})^{3/2} (a+a^{\dagger})^3 = \gamma (a^3+3Na+3Na^{\dagger} + 3a + (a^{\dagger})^3)##.

The only possible other states are ##|0 \rangle##, ##| 2\rangle##, ##|4\rangle##. The state corrected on the first order is:

##|\Psi \rangle = |1 \rangle + c_0|0 \rangle + c_2|2 \rangle + c_4|4\rangle##

where ##c_k = \langle k| V(x) | 1 \rangle ##.
Your expression for ##c_k## doesn't have the correct dimensions. Did you leave out something?

damarkk said:
What are the probability to find the oscillator in a generic state ##|n \rangle##?


My answer is ##P_k = |c_k|^2##, but for k=1 we have ##P_1 = 1##. This is not possible I think. On the other hand, I suppose that ##P_1 = 1-P_0 - P_2- P_4 = 1-|c_0|^2-|c_2|^2-|c_4|^2##, but how can I show this? The coefficient of ##| 1\rangle## is 1. This is my question.
From ##|\Psi \rangle = |1 \rangle + c_0|0 \rangle + c_2|2 \rangle + c_4|4\rangle##, you can see that ##|\Psi \rangle## is not normalized.

That's ok. The probability ##P_k## is then ##|c_k|^2/\langle \Psi |\Psi \rangle##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top