How Do You Prove the Volume of a Bravais Lattice?

FONE
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Proving Bravais Lattice Volume?!?

Hi guys,

So with a Bravais lattice, you have 3 basis vectors: a1, a2, and a3.

I know that you would get the volume of the lattice as a scalar product of the three: V = a1 dot [a2 x a3].

How would you start going about PROVING this? A little direction to start would be helpful.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FONE said:
Hi guys,

So with a Bravais lattice, you have 3 basis vectors: a1, a2, and a3.

I know that you would get the volume of the lattice as a scalar product of the three: V = a1 dot [a2 x a3].

How would you start going about PROVING this? A little direction to start would be helpful.

Thanks!
You start by recognizing or proving that the area of a parallelogram is the product of the lengths of adjacent sides times the sine of the included angle. Then you recognize that the volume of any prism (right prism or not) is the area of the base times the height. Then you relate that to the triple scalar product.
 
That was very helpful, thanks!



OlderDan said:
You start by recognizing or proving that the area of a parallelogram is the product of the lengths of adjacent sides times the sine of the included angle. Then you recognize that the volume of any prism (right prism or not) is the area of the base times the height. Then you relate that to the triple scalar product.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top