How Do You Solve 4^x = 8x Algebraically?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 4^x = 8x presents challenges for algebraic solutions due to its transcendental nature. While taking the natural logarithm was attempted, it did not yield helpful results. The equation has two real solutions, which can be determined graphically. Additionally, the solutions can be expressed using the Lambert W function. Understanding these methods is essential for solving such equations effectively.
amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
Wow, I can't believe I couldn't do this.

4^x=8x

I tried taking the natural logarithm of both sides, but that didn't help very much. I can see that an answer is 2, but I want to know how to get to that algebraicly.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
who says you can do it algebraically?
 
It has 2 real solutions which can be found graphically.The equation is transcendental.

The solutions are expressible in terms of the Lambert function

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
Alright well thanks for your help.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top