How Do You Solve a Circuit with Four Meshes Using Mesh Analysis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving a circuit with four meshes using Mesh Analysis, specifically applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and the relationship V=IR. The user outlines their approach to defining loop currents in a clockwise direction and sets up equations for each loop. Key corrections are provided, emphasizing the need for accurate supermesh equations and clarifying the relationship between currents I_0, I_3, and I_2. The final conclusion is that I_0 is not equal to I_3 but rather I_0 = I_3 - I_2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Mesh Analysis in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Basic knowledge of current sources and supermeshes
  • Proficiency in solving linear equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study advanced applications of Mesh Analysis in complex circuits
  • Learn about supermesh techniques in circuit analysis
  • Explore the implications of current sources on mesh currents
  • Review examples of KVL applications in multi-loop circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Mesh Analysis and circuit behavior in multi-mesh configurations.

DefaultName
Messages
179
Reaction score
0
Mesh Analysis -- (4 meshes)

Homework Statement



http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/1541/screenshot01ly9.jpg

Homework Equations



V=IR
KVL

The Attempt at a Solution



Loop 1 is the top left loop.
Loop 2 is the top right loop.
Loop 3 is the bottom right loop.
Loop 4 is the bottom left loop.
(Think of the quadrants in the cartesian coordinate system... that's my loop and loop currents).

Loop currents are going in the CW direction.

For Loop 1:

-14 + I_1 + (I_1 - I_2) + (I_1 - I_4) = 0

For Loop 2:

I_2 = 2mA

For Loop 3 & 4:

Since they are super meshes because of the shared current source... this is what I have:

4mA = I_3 - I_4
-- and --
using the supermesh idea, and short-circuiting the shared 4mA current source...

I4 + 2*I3 + I3 + I4 = 0... which is 3I_3 + 2I_4 = 0

Is my setup correct?

If so, this is what I did...

solved for I_4 in the equation 3I_3 + 2I_4 = 0... I_4 = (-3I_3) / 2

I plugged that I_4 into the eq. 4mA = I_3 - I_4... and I got I_3 = 2mA.

I assumed I_0, what we're trying to find, is equal to I_3. Is this a valid assumption since the current is going around that mesh?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your supermesh equation is incorrect. Starting from the lower left it should be 1k*i_4 + 1k*(i_4 - i_1) + 2k*(i_3 - i_2) + 1k*i_3 = 0

Because of that, your assumption about I_0 is also wrong. The current in that branch is flowing between meshes 2 and 3, so the current is a combination of the two: I_0 = I_3 - I_2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 187 ·
7
Replies
187
Views
59K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K