Can Mesh Analysis with Three Loops Solve a Four-Loop Circuit?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a four-loop circuit using mesh analysis, specifically addressing the challenges faced when attempting to solve for unknown currents with only three loop equations. Participants share their attempts, results, and issues encountered while using a spreadsheet for calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their homework problem involving a circuit with four loops and expresses confusion about using only three loops to find the unknown currents.
  • Participants share their loop equations, with one questioning the sign of the voltage terms in the equations for loops 2 and 3.
  • Another participant mentions that they were able to solve the equations using Matlab and obtained the same results as a spreadsheet, suggesting that the loop equations appear correct.
  • Some participants note that entering a small value (0.001 or 0.0001) in the spreadsheet's matrix allows it to compute values, indicating a potential issue with zero values in the calculations.
  • One participant reports that their answers did not match the original post's results, although they had correct magnitudes but incorrect phases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the correctness of the original answers provided, as participants have differing results and experiences with the spreadsheet. Some agree on the need for adjustments in the spreadsheet to facilitate calculations, while others express uncertainty about the validity of their answers.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention issues related to the spreadsheet's handling of zero values and the potential impact on the accuracy of their results. There are also references to feedback from tutors that highlight discrepancies in phases of the answers.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students working on circuit analysis problems, particularly those using mesh analysis and computational tools like spreadsheets or Matlab for solving systems of equations.

billyray
Messages
58
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I have a circuit that I am to analyse and find I. I am told to use an excel matrix sheet given to me to solve 3 unknowns. I have 4 loops so this is a problem. I have made an attempt using three loops and referred to a previous thread on here for some help. It says I can do it with three loops.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/ac-circuit-analysis-mesh-and-nodal.791744/
[/B]

Homework Equations

I have attempted the question many times and am including my results. They do not seem to agree with the results for the agreed answer on here.
Loop 1 --- 120-(2)I1-(I1-I2)(-j5)=0
Loop2 --- (-j5)(I2-I1)+(j4)(I2-I3)-14.14+j14.14=0
Loop3 --- (j4)(I3-I2)+(4)I3-j120=0

Answers;
I1=19.1624+j12.5642
I2= 14.1367-j3.77088
I3= 23.9538+j20.1829 [/B]
I can't seem to upload spread sheet

The Attempt at a Solution


I am incuding this and a spead sheet I am using. any pointers would be amazing as I am completely lost wheln I use the spreadsheet.[/B]
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
here is the pic of the spread sheet
 

Attachments

  • excell screen shot.PNG
    excell screen shot.PNG
    22.9 KB · Views: 522
billyray said:
Loop 1 --- 120-(2)I1-(I1-I2)(-j5)=0
Loop2 --- (-j5)(I2-I1)+(j4)(I2-I3)-14.14+j14.14=0
Loop3 --- (j4)(I3-I2)+(4)I3-j120=0
Are you confident about the sign of the voltage terms in loops 2 and 3? Read through the related conversation with the OP in the thread you referenced: he had the same issue!
 
Last edited:
hi gneil

thanks again for help. I have changed my answers but they still won't work in spread sheet
 

Attachments

billyray said:
hi gneil

thanks again for help. I have changed my answers but they still won't work in spread sheet
As far as I can tell with a quick glance, your recent attemp2.pdf shows correct loop equations. Good!

Regarding the spreadsheet's inability to solve the equations, take a look at the conversation that occurred in the thread that you referenced previously, starting around post #98 :wink:
 
thanks gneill will do tommorow. Thanks again so much
 
I'm trying to follow along. I put a 0.001 in the center cell of the Real matrix, as the warning suggested. This allows the spreadsheet to calculate values.
I put the same matrix into Matlab and solved the system and arrive at the same answers as the spreadsheet.
As far as I can tell, your loops and matrices look correct. Are the answers in the original post the "correct" answers that you are supposed to arrive at?
 
I have done this question and can tell you that I couldn't get the thing to work at all with some zero values. As scottdave above says, you need to put in a very small number just to allow it to compute.

Having just looked at my tutor feedback document, I did get the phases incorrect in my answer (+ instead of -), but the magnitudes were all correct, and mine don't match any of those in your original post.
 
Matlab is commercial software package. If you don't have access to that, Scilab and Octave are pretty good alternatives, which are free.
 
  • #10
Thanks scottdave and Numbskull.

I have obtained the correct answers by entering 0.0001 in the spreadsheet. Thanks for help though. I always thought it would be me wrong and not the spreadsheet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 187 ·
7
Replies
187
Views
59K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K