How Do You Solve a Constrained Optimization Problem on a Unit Sphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter notnottrue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimisation
notnottrue
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The temperature of a point on a unit sphere, centered at the origin, is given by
T(x,y,y)=xy+yz

Homework Equations


I know that the equation of a unit sphere is x^2+y^2+x^2=1, which will be the constraint.


The Attempt at a Solution


The partial derivatives of T are y, x+z and y respectively.
Unit circle partial derivatives are 2x, 2y and 2z.

From a theorem in the lecture notes∇T(x,y,z)=\lambda∇G(x,y,z)
G being the constraint. With the critical points when these equal 0.

So I get y-\lambda2x=0
x+z-\lambda2y=0
y-\lambda2z=0
with \lambda2x=\lambda2z

Firstly, am I on the right track? If so, what is the next move?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
notnottrue said:

Homework Statement


The temperature of a point on a unit sphere, centered at the origin, is given by
T(x,y,y)=xy+yz

Homework Equations


I know that the equation of a unit sphere is x^2+y^2+x^2=1, which will be the constraint.


The Attempt at a Solution


The partial derivatives of T are y, x+z and y respectively.
Unit circle partial derivatives are 2x, 2y and 2z.

From a theorem in the lecture notes∇T(x,y,z)=\lambda∇G(x,y,z)
G being the constraint. With the critical points when these equal 0.

So I get y-\lambda2x=0
x+z-\lambda2y=0
y-\lambda2z=0
with \lambda2x=\lambda2z

Firstly, am I on the right track? If so, what is the next move?
Thanks

Well, you haven't actually stated the question, so I would start with that...
 
notnottrue said:

Homework Statement


The temperature of a point on a unit sphere, centered at the origin, is given by
T(x,y,y)=xy+yz

Homework Equations


I know that the equation of a unit sphere is x^2+y^2+x^2=1, which will be the constraint.


The Attempt at a Solution


The partial derivatives of T are y, x+z and y respectively.
Unit circle partial derivatives are 2x, 2y and 2z.

From a theorem in the lecture notes∇T(x,y,z)=\lambda∇G(x,y,z)
G being the constraint. With the critical points when these equal 0.

So I get y-\lambda2x=0
x+z-\lambda2y=0
y-\lambda2z=0
with \lambda2x=\lambda2z

Firstly, am I on the right track? If so, what is the next move?
Thanks

The last equality implies either (a) λ = 0; or (b) x = z. Try to see what else happens in both cases (a) and (b).

RGV
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top