How Do You Solve the Inequality (x+3)/(x-4) < 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter powp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
To solve the inequality (x+3)/(x-4) < 1, first recognize that the expression is undefined at x=4, where the denominator equals zero. By simplifying the inequality, it can be rewritten as 7/(x-4) < 0, indicating that the solution involves determining when the fraction is negative. Testing values reveals that the inequality holds true for x < 4, as values greater than 4 yield a positive result. The solution confirms that x must be less than 4 for the original inequality to be satisfied.
powp
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
How do I sovle the following:

Need to solve this inequality

(x+3)/(x-4) < 1

This is what I have gotten to but not sure how to state the solution or if it right

7/(x-4) <0



Solve for x

2x^(2/3)-x^(1/3)-6 = 0

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For the first one, what can you say about an expression like (x-4)^ Is it ever negative for any real value of x ? What happens when you multiply both sides of the inequality by it ?

For the second one, do you know how to solve a quadratic ? Try putting x^{\frac{1}{3}} = y[/tex] and see what you get.
 
The simplest way to solve complicated (non-linear) inequalities is to solve the equation: The only way a continuous function can change from "< 1" to "> 1" is to pass through 1. And a rational function (fraction) is continuous every where except where the denominator is 0.
First solve \frac{x+3}{x-4}= 1 which is the same as x+3= x-4. But that's equivalent to 3= -4 and is never true. That means the only way the fraction can jump from "< 1" to "> 1" is where the denominator is 0: x= 4.
The only thing remaining is to check one value above 4 and one below: if x= 5
\frac{5+3}{5-4}= 8&gt; 1 and if x= 0 \frac{0+3}{0-4}= -\frac{3}{4}&lt; 1.
The inequality is true for x< 4.

As Curious3141 said, let y= x1/3 so that x2/3= y2 and the equation becomes 2y2- y- 6= 0. Solve that for y and then find x.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The simplest way to solve complicated (non-linear) inequalities is to solve the equation: The only way a continuous function can change from "< 1" to "> 1" is to pass through 1. And a rational function (fraction) is continuous every where except where the denominator is 0.
First solve \frac{x+3}{x-4}= 1 which is the same as x+3= x-4. But that's equivalent to 3= -4 and is never true. That means the only way the fraction can jump from "< 1" to "> 1" is where the denominator is 0: x= 4.
The only thing remaining is to check one value above 4 and one below: if x= 5
\frac{5+3}{5-4}= 8&gt; 1 and if x= 0 \frac{0+3}{0-4}= -\frac{3}{4}&lt; 1.
The inequality is true for x< 4.

IMHO, the more direct and comprehensible way to solve this sort of problem is simply to multiply the inequality by a term that's always positive in such a way as to remove the fraction. It's even easier in this case when the coefficient of the unknown term is the same between the numerator and denominator, that means we're going to get a simple linear inequality at the end of it. The method should be kept simple by avoiding expanding in the intermediate stages.

Here's how I would've done it :

\frac{x+3}{x-4} &lt; 1

Multiply LHS and RHS by {(x-4)}^2, which is positive for all real x.

(x+3)(x-4) &lt; {(x-4)}^2

Group the terms together.

(x+3-x+4)(x-4) &lt; 0
7(x-4) &lt; 0
x &lt; 4

Personally, I prefer this solution because it seems more direct. It can be used in all "ratio" form inequalities, but if the coefficients of the numerator and denominator are unequal, one would end up with a quadratic inequality. Which is still very easy to solve because it remains factorised throughout.
 
Everyone has there own favorite method of attacking this type of problem. Personally I find it easiest to just break it into regions, in this case condisder x>4 and x<4 seperately.

Region 1 : x>4
x+3 < x-4
+3 < -4
false in entire region

Region 2 : x<4
x+3 > x-4 {note the reversal of the inequality due to mult by negative}
+3 > -4
true in entire region.

"Region" 3 : x=4
function is indeterminate.

So the solution is x<4
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top