How Do You Solve the Integral of (26x+36)/[(3x-2)(x^2+4)] dx?

dangish
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Q: Find the Integral of (26x+36)/[(3x-2)(x^2+4)] dx

Here is my attempt:

First i set it up so that,

(26x+36) / [(3x-2)(x^2+4)] = A/(3x-2) + (Bx+C)/(x^2+4)

Then,

26x + 36 = A(x^2+4) + (Bx+C)(3x-2)

= Ax^2 + 4A + Bx^2+Bx+Cx+C <---(This is where I think I went wrong)

= (A+B)x^2 + (B+C)x + (4A+C)

Then I get the system of equations,

A + B = 0
B + C = 26
4A + C = 36

Which I can't solve.

Once I get A,B,C I can take it from there, any help would be much appreciated :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Take these two

B + C = 26 ...1
4A + C = 36...2

If you subtract equation 1 from 2, you will get an equation with A and B in it, which you can then solve with A + B = 0.
 
dangish said:
= Ax^2 + 4A + Bx^2+Bx+Cx+C <---(This is where I think I went wrong)

= (A+B)x^2 + (B+C)x + (4A+C)

Expanding (Bx+C)(3x-2) should give:

3Bx^2 -2Bx +3Cx - 2C

Note that you could have solved for A before expanding this. To do this, notice that (3x-2) can be set to 0 by using x=...?
 
Fragment said:
Expanding (Bx+C)(3x-2) should give:

3Bx^2 -2Bx +3Cx - 2C

Haha I was right where I went wrong, that was stupid, thanks..
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top