How Do You Solve This Organic Chemistry Mechanism Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shiznites
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanism
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a complex organic chemistry mechanism involving an epoxide. The initial approach includes protonating the epoxide and using the resulting -OH group to attack a carbonyl, but confusion arises regarding the next steps. Key insights suggest preserving the carbonyl carbon and the bridged carbon-oxygen bond throughout the mechanism. The solution involves hydrolysis of the epoxide, followed by Fischer esterification, leading to the formation of an ester bridge and subsequent dehydration. Ultimately, the mechanism is clarified by understanding the structural changes and maintaining certain bonds intact.
shiznites
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
ORGANIC CHEMISTRY II

Homework Statement


I spent hours trying to figure out how to do this mechanism but I always get stuck. Its tricky and will make you think.. think you can figure it out?

z157831749.jpg



Homework Equations


Figure out the mechanism just using acid (H+)


The Attempt at a Solution


I started out by reducing the epoxide by protinating and was left with a -OH group on each carbon that made up the epoxide. Using one of those -OH groups I attack the carbonyl on the opposite side (using the -OH group as a nucleophile).

Basically I don't know where to go from there or if that's even a correct start. I sat here for awhile staring at my 3D model and came up nowhere. I know that somewhere down the line there will be dehydration somewhere.

Your help is greatly appreciated =]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the rightmost ring in the product. Assume that the carbonyl carbon is preserved in the reaction. Count the carbons starting with carbonyl then methylene then the two bridged carbons and finally the oxygen. How many units in the ring? How many carbons? Assume that the bridged carbon to oxygen bond in the ring is preserved in your mechanism. Now you know what part of the molecule is unchanged in the mechanism. Start your mechanism by protonating the epoxide as you suggested and then break one of the C-O bonds. Remember that one of those C-O bonds winds up in the product (so don't break that one!) and the carbon attached to it becomes a bridged carbon.
 
I figured it out.

Hydrolysis to the epoxide which breaks it open. Then Fischer esterification which forms the ester bridge. Upon the completion of Fischer the adjacent C-C bond breaks to reform the carbonyl from the intermediate. This leaves a cation. Dehydrate and bam.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top