How Do You Write the Balanced Reaction Equation for an Iron-Nickel Cell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crosbykins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
To write the balanced reaction equation for an iron-nickel cell, identify the half-reactions for iron and nickel. The cell consists of a strip of iron in a 1mol/L Fe2+ solution and a strip of nickel in a 1mol/L Ni2+ solution. The standard cell potential (∆E⁰) is calculated as 0.66V, with equilibrium at 0V. To find the equilibrium constant (Ke), the value of n, representing the moles of electrons transferred, must be determined from the balanced equation. This approach simplifies the calculation of Q, which is equal to Ke at equilibrium.
crosbykins
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An iron-nickel cell uses a salt bridge to join a half-cell containing a strip of iron in a 1mol/L solution of Fe2+ to a half cell which contains a strip of nickel in a 1mol/L Ni2+ solution. Calculate Ke for the reaction.


Homework Equations



∆E = ∆E⁰ - .0592V/n log Q

The Attempt at a Solution



so using ∆E⁰= ∆E⁰r (cathode) - ∆E⁰r (anode), I know that ∆E⁰= .66V, and I also know that at equilibrium ther is 0V, so ∆E =0. I know that Q is = to Ke, so i need to solve for Q. Problem is I don't know how to find the value of n (the amount, in moles, of electrons transferred according to the cell reaction)
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Have you tried the simplest approach - write balanced reaction equation?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top