How Does a 15.8 Gt Quake Compare to All the World's Nukes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThomasEdison
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A 15.8 gigaton explosion, equivalent to an 8.8 magnitude earthquake, surpasses the combined explosive yield of the world's nuclear stockpiles, which average around 0.5 gigatons when considering the US and Russia's reduced arsenals. The earthquake's energy is immense, capable of moving thousands of cubic kilometers of rock, and its duration adds to its destructive potential. Each tremor during the quake could theoretically be viewed as a separate 15.8 gigaton blast, complicating comparisons. The scale of 15.8 gigatons is difficult to visualize, equating to an enormous quantity of TNT, far exceeding typical explosive scenarios. Overall, the energy released by such earthquakes dwarfs that of nuclear detonations, highlighting their significant geological impact.
ThomasEdison
Messages
100
Reaction score
1
According to Wiki's Richtor Scale the 8.8 quake was equal to a 15.8gigaton explosion.

How does a 15.8 Gt explosion measure up to all the World's nuclear stockpiles detonating at once in one spot?

Stronger or weaker?

Then what about the fact that this quake lasted several minutes. Would each individual tremor of the 8.8 be considered one 15.8 gigaton blast?


When I tried to understand 15.8g as a large pile of TNT, I came up with 43,287 Empire State buildings made out of TNT lined up side by side. It's difficult to imagine a pile of TNT that large detonating. 15.8 gigatons is such a large number for an explosive force.

At least with numbers that big it is not so difficult to imagine an 8.8 changing the rotation of the Earth which quakes this large do.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
The total energy for the quake was 15.8Gt tnt - it takes quite a lot of energy to move 1000s of cubic km of rock even a small distance, and a lot more energy to compress and deform them.

The US and Russia have reduced their stockpiles to 'only' (!) around 3000 weapons each, say an average 100kT yield = 0.5Gt total. Even at their peak the capacity was nothing like the energy in an earthquake (or a major hurricane)

If you detonated all these weapons 30km underground 80km offshore as in the Chilean quake you probably wouldn't even detect it without special equipement.
 
Thread 'The Secrets of Prof. Verschure's Rosetta Stones'
(Edit: since the thread title was changed, this first sentence is too cryptic: the original title referred to a Tool song....) Besides being a favorite song by a favorite band, the thread title is a straightforward play on words. This summer, as a present to myself for being promoted, I purchased a collection of thin sections that I believe comprise the research materials of Prof. Rob Verschure, who at the time was faculty in the Geological Institute in Amsterdam. What changed this...
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Back
Top