How Does a Cavity Inside a Charged Sphere Affect Electric Field Calculations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field in different regions of a charged insulating sphere with a cavity. The electric field inside the cavity at 1.43 cm is correctly determined to be zero due to the absence of charge. For the electric field at 2.86 cm, the user struggles with calculations involving Gauss' Law, particularly in determining the charge enclosed and the surface area. A suggested correction involves using the volume charge density and the correct formula for charge, leading to an electric field value of approximately 2161.9 N/C. The user is encouraged to double-check their calculations for accuracy.
sonrie
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
An insulating sphere of radius 5.00 cm , centered at the origin, has a uniform volume charge density 3.05 uC/m^3 . There is a spherical cavity cut out of its center of radius 2.00 cm.

Well i know to use Gauss' Law:
Φ = ∫E∙dA = Q/ε
where Φ is the electric flux, E is the electric field, dA is a differential area on the closed surface S with an outward facing surface normal defining its direction, Q is the charge enclosed by the surface, and ε is the electric constant.

1.) What is the electric field at 1.43 cm ?
I found that to be zero.

2.) What is the electric field inside the spherical shell at 2.86 cm ?

Q = (4π/3)*(0.0286^3-0.0200^3)*3.05x10^-6C
The surface area integrated over is: S = 4π*0.0286^2. Hence:
E = Q/εS = (0.0286^3-0.0200^3)*3.05x10^-6/(3ε*0.028...

for surface area i get 1.03*10^-2, for Q i get 4.188*1.53*10^-5*3.05*10^-6= 1.95*10^-10
Then i divide Q/S which is 1.90*10^-12. but i keep getting it wrong. what am i doing wrong?

3.) What is the electric field outside the spherical shell at 6.75 cm ?
Q = (4π/3)*(0.0500^3-0.0200^3)*3.05x10^-6C
The surface area integrated over is: S = 4π*0.0675^2. Hence:
E = Q/εS = (0.0500^3-0.0200^3)*3.05x10^-6/(3ε*0.067...

I did the same as part two equations and i get 3.89*10^-9 which is wrong also. Help!





3. The Attempt at a Solution [/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) is right, since there is no charge in the cavity.

For the others, I'm getting a headache reading all the digits :p It might be easier to spot a mistake if you write it out in symbols. I'll try that now.
 
Right,

2) After using gauss' law you should find:
E = \frac{Q}{\epsilon A}
Q is in this case dependend on the charge density rho and the volume V:
Q = \rho V = \rho \frac{4 \pi}{3}(r^3 - {r_0}^3) where r is 2.86 cm and r_0 is the radius of the cavity (2 cm)

E = \frac{\rho \frac{4 \pi}{3}(r^3 - {r_0}^3)}{\epsilon 4 \pi r^2} = \frac{\rho (r^3 - {r_0}^3)}{3 \epsilon r^2}

Entering values:
r = 0.0286, r_0 = 0.02, \epsilon = 8.85 \times 10^{-12}, \rho = 3.05 \times 10^{-6} yields:
E = 2161.9 (provided I didn't make any errors while entering the values in my calculator :p )

What should the answer be according to you?
 
Thanks A Bunch!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top