How Does a Dipole Affect the Electric Field Near a Neutral Metallic Sheet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ukamle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
A dipole with charges +/- q near a neutral metallic sheet induces opposite charges on the sheet, resulting in an electric field that has no tangential components and normal components influenced by both the dipole and image charges. The strength of the electric field is strong and directed towards the sheet when the dipole is close, but it diminishes with increasing distance, eventually becoming negligible. The orientation of the dipole affects the direction of the electric field; if parallel to the sheet, the field points towards it, while if perpendicular, it points away. The interaction between the dipole's charges and the induced charges on the sheet is crucial in determining the electric field's behavior. Ultimately, the electric field's characteristics are contingent on both distance and dipole orientation.
ukamle
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
here is a problem:

if a dipole with charges +/- q is brought near a neutral metallic sheet then what is the electric field near the sheet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the principle of images, it works for dipole as well as charges.

The electric field will have no tangential components on the sheet,
the normal components will be thos of the dipole + image charges.
 


The electric field near the neutral metallic sheet will depend on the distance between the dipole and the sheet. If the dipole is very close to the sheet, the electric field will be strong and directed towards the sheet. This is because the charges on the dipole will induce opposite charges on the surface of the sheet, creating a strong electric field between them.

However, as the distance between the dipole and the sheet increases, the electric field will decrease. This is because the influence of the dipole's charges on the sheet's charges will weaken with distance. Eventually, at a large enough distance, the electric field near the sheet will become negligible and the field will be nearly zero.

It is also important to note that the direction of the electric field near the sheet will depend on the orientation of the dipole. If the dipole is oriented parallel to the sheet, the electric field will be directed towards the sheet. If the dipole is oriented perpendicular to the sheet, the electric field will be directed away from the sheet.

In summary, the electric field near a neutral metallic sheet will be strong when a dipole with charges +/- q is brought near, but will decrease with distance and depend on the orientation of the dipole. This is due to the interaction between the charges on the dipole and the induced charges on the surface of the sheet.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top