How Does a Down Quark Transform Into an Up Quark During Beta Decay?

ythaaa
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
for beta decay
n --> p + e- + antineutrino

since neutron has quarks udd while proton has uud, only the d changes to u. is it correct to guess that it is the down quark inside the neutron which "transform" into up quark?

ie d --> u + e- + antineutrino
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, though there is an intermediate state, in that the process is actually :

d \to u + W^{-} \to u + e^{-} + \bar{\nu}_{e}

The intermediate step was not known about when the weak force was first being modeled because it only exists for a tiny amount of time because the W boson is so massive and unstable.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top