How Does a Gaussian Wave Packet Spread Over Time?

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
We finally started modern quantum mechanics. I'm definitely feeling a bit lost or fuzzy, especially in the more rigorous book Quantum Physics by Gasiorowicz. At any rate, we have two more problem sets before the last exam.

As for the problem, I'm not sure what to. Is it asking to calculate the fractional change in size of a wave packet when it spreads to 10^-10 m from 10^-16 m? I guess I could also call the given dimensions L, such as in delta-x = L/2 or something. Sorry for the poor scan.

5a.jpg


5.jpg

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well to start with what is the wavefunction (as a function of space and time) of a Gaussian representing a free particle.

What could we mean by the 'size' of the wavepacket?

(I think the question is asking you to calculate the fractional change in size of the wavepacket over a time period of one second for the case when its initial size is 10^-10, and then separately calculate it for the case when its initial size is 10^-16)
 
fantispug said:
Well to start with what is the wavefunction (as a function of space and time) of a Gaussian representing a free particle.

What could we mean by the 'size' of the wavepacket?

(I think the question is asking you to calculate the fractional change in size of the wavepacket over a time period of one second for the case when its initial size is 10^-10, and then separately calculate it for the case when its initial size is 10^-16)

The Gaussian wave function is (sorry I still haven't learned latex yet)

psi-(x,t) = integral from negative infinity to positive infinity of dk A(k)e^(kx-wt)

From remembering what's in my Modern Physics textbook, the size of the wave packet could be half of the wavelength. And there's a relation I think that applies to all wave functions generally: delta-k * delta-x = 1/2
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top