How does a gyroscope react to external torque and gravitational forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bull85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gyroscope Torque
AI Thread Summary
A gyroscope reacts to external torque and gravitational forces by exhibiting precession when its rotation around a vertical axis is stopped. When an object is placed in front of the gyroscope, it raises questions about how the gyroscope's stability is affected by additional external torque. If a counter-torque is applied to resist the induced precession torque, the gyroscope is expected to gently fall rather than drop abruptly, as some torque due to gravity is still converted into precession torque. This behavior indicates that the gyroscope maintains some degree of angular momentum despite the counteracting forces. Understanding these interactions is crucial for applications involving gyroscopic motion and stability.
Bull85
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I would like to know how react the gyroscope like in this video:

http://gyroscope.com/youtube.asp?movie=4KlddP16uuU

if I stop the rotate around vertical axis. The gravity cause the precession but if I place an object in front of the gyroscope how does it works ?

Thanks

Bull
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Bull is asking: If we were to apply an external torque to resist the induced precession torque, would the gyroscope drop to the ground as if it had no gyroscopic action at all, or would it gently fall to the ground, since some of it's torque due to gravity in the theta direction is still being converted into a precession torque in the phi direction?

I believe if we were to apply a counter-torque to the precession torque, the gryoscope would gently fall the the ground, since it's still exerting the precession torque, it just isn't accompanied by a change in angular momentum. I tried putting up some Latex, but it looks like Latex is down.

Can anyone comment on this?
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top