I How does a magnetic field affect the aggregation of nonpolar molecules in water?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pyrophoric
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dipoles Induced
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the interaction between magnetic fields and the aggregation of nonpolar molecules, specifically thin wax in water. It highlights the role of water's dipoles in facilitating the hydrophobic effect, which promotes nonpolar molecule aggregation due to entropy changes. The conversation raises questions about the impact of applying a magnetic field on water's dipoles and whether this would require calculating the net charge vector on nonpolar molecules. Additionally, it suggests that the effects observed may relate more to surface tension at the water-wax boundary rather than direct magnetic influence. The topic is proposed as a potential area for undergraduate physics research.
Pyrophoric
I'm an undergrad biochemistry major at a state university in NY (I've tried the chemistry forums already) trying to understand more about interactions between polar and non-polar molecules. Say I have a thin wax in water, we are taught that the entropy of the reordering of water contributes more to the aggregation of nonpolar molecules than their own affinity for each other (hydrophobic effect) so basically the dipoles of water act as an external force that compresses nonpolar molecules together around clathrage or solvation cages (reordering of water molecules to fit nonpolar substance while increasing entropy) This has me thinking, most nonpolar molecules contain van der waals forces that are derived from polarizable electron clouds that fluctuate depending on their immediate environment. So let's say I apply a magnetic field to water so that all the dipoles are reinforced in the same direction, would I have to determine the charge vector on each atom and add them all up to find the net effect on the nonpolar molecule (thin wax)? Any direction or advice is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
With regard to using a magnetic field, keep in mind that it affects the magnetic dipole which is different from the electric dipole you are referring to earlier. Assuming you meant to introduce an electrostatic field instead then I'd have to say...
...firstly that I don't know. Your description of the effective force on the small hydrophobic material would seem to me to be effectively the surface tension of the water at the water-wax boundary which is not lessened (relative to say water-air) since the wax is non-polar. My first line of investigation would be to see if water has any electrostrictive property in general and then if there is an electrostrictive effect on the surface tension.

This, by the way, sounds like an interesting line of physics research that could be carried out at a small university or undergraduate institution. Hmmm...
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top