How Does a Mooney Rhomb Convert Linear Light to Circular Polarized Light?

andrewm
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A Mooney rhomb is a quadrilateral prism that converts linear light to circular polarized light. The question is here:

http://books.google.ca/books?id=SL1...hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result"

Homework Equations



Trigonometry. Snell's law.

The Attempt at a Solution



Total internal reflection must occur at the edge of the rhomb. The total phase change due to TIR must be pi/4. But there are too many equations, and too few constraints!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the Mooney Rhomb accomplishes the same feat as the Fresnal rhomb.
But, here is the equation to find the difference in the angle between the S and P polarization:

tan(del/2)=cosA*sqrt(sin^2(A)-(nt/ni)^2)/sin^2(A)

Where A is the incident angle, nt is transmitted index, ni is incident index, and del is the phase difference produced between the two types of polarizations.

For the Mooney Rhomb there are two TIR's and each needs to produce pi/4 phase difference for circularly polarized light to be produced.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top