A How Does a Particle's Energy State Change in a Non-Uniform 2D Corridor?

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
607
Suppose we have a particle of mass ##m## moving freely in the xy-plane, except for being constrained by hard walls to have ##-L/2 < y < L/2##. Now, the energy eigenstates would be something like

##\psi (x,y) = C \psi_x (x) \psi_y (y) = C e^{-ikx}\cos\left(\frac{n\pi y}{L}\right) ##,

where ##n## would have to be an odd integer, it seems. So, now the total energy ##E## would be a sum from the free-particle motion in the x-direction and particle-in-box motion in y-direction.

Now, suppose that the 2d "corridor" the particle is moving in is not of constant width ##L##, but has some width ##L_1## when ##x < x_1## and other width ##L_2## when ##x > x_2##. Also, between ##x_1## and ##x_2## the width increases linearly from ##L_1## to ##L_2##.

In the region ##x < x_1## the energy eigenfunctions would be like ##\psi (x,y) = C_1 e^{ik_1 x}\cos\left(\frac{n\pi y}{L_1}\right)## and in region ##x > x_2## they would be like ##\psi (x,y) = C_2 e^{ik_2 x}\cos\left(\frac{n\pi y}{L_2}\right)##. If ##L_2 > L_1##, it would seem to be required that ##k_2 > k_1## to make the total energy eigenvalue the same in both regions despite the ground-state energy of the particle-in-box like y-motion being smaller when the width of the corridor is larger.

Questions:

1. If the distance between ##x_1## and ##x_2## is very large compared compared to the difference ##| L_1 - L_2 |##, can the wavefunction between ##x_1## and ##x_2## be approximated by something like

##\psi (x,y) = Ce^{ik(x)x}\cos\left(\frac{n\pi y}{L(x)}\right)##,

where the functions ##L(x)## and ##k(x)## change linearly between ##x = x_1## and ##x = x_2## ?

2. Is this kind of a problem described in any textbook or journal article ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. I would expect so, but I'm not sure if that approximation tells you what you want, because it doesn't reflect the dynamics of the particle. The slope transfers momentum between the two directions.

What about the odd states, by the way (sine instead of cosine)?
 
Oh, yes, there are also the odd states. I was thinking of this as some kind of an exercise I invented myself. I think it's possible to show that the approximation approaches an exact eigenstate when ##\left|\frac{L_2 - L_1}{x_2 - x_1}\right| \rightarrow 0##, by showing that the energy standard deviation approaches zero at that limit.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top