Phys12 said:
I've heard time and again of people whose research experience comes entirely from their university who did not end up going to a grad school
Lots of people get into amazing graduate schools with research experience limited to their undergraduate institutions. In fact I would say that this is the case for the majority of graduate students admitted anywhere - at least in my experience.
What really matters is the quality of the research experience - what skills you pick up and what you accomplish in it. A student who spends his or her summer playing solitaire and doesn't produce anything more than a regurgitation of the professor's project proposal is likely to struggle with graduate admissions. A student who authors a paper that gets accepted in Nature is going to have a much high chance of getting in at his or her choice of schools. Both regardless of where they do the work.
If it were the case that doing your PhD in your undergraduate institution was not looked down upon, I would've happily continued to work with my current professors.
This is a popular misconception. No one seriously looks down on a PhD graduate who did a bachelor's degree at the same institution. I've been on several hiring committees over the years and this has yet to come up as an issue.
The misconception comes from the idea that are
advantages to doing your PhD at a different school: you get exposed to different styles of teaching, different professors will focus on different things which will strengthen your own understanding of specific topics, you broaden your academic network, you get to live in a different city, etc. But there are also advantages to staying at the same school. You know they system and the local environment. You can continue on with a research project that you started as an undergrad, thus having less of a learning curve to climb and can produce results faster, you know which professors you work well with and which ones you don't, etc.As a general guiding rule for questions like this (what to spend your summer doing), it's generally best to focus most on:
- What skills are you likely to develop? Or what knowledge are you likely to gain?
- How interesting is the project to you?
- How much are you going to be paid?
- What connections are you likely to make?
- Are you likely to enjoy yourself in that particular environment?
- What are the end goals of the project? Do you understand how to get to them?
When factors like this are all otherwise on par, then you can get into questions of academic pedigree to act as tie breakers.