How Does a TC Circuit Utilize Capacitors and Voltage for Resonance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the operation of a Tesla coil (TC) circuit, particularly how capacitors and voltage contribute to resonance. It explains that the tank capacitor charges until the breakdown of the gap occurs, leading to an LC resonance in the primary circuit, which excites the secondary circuit. The confusion arises regarding why the gap breaks down due to the capacitor's voltage rather than the power supply's voltage, despite both being the same. The conversation highlights that during the initial AC cycle, the voltage across the gap reaches a maximum, causing it to spark and complete the DC circuit, allowing energy to oscillate between the capacitor and inductor at resonant frequency. Ultimately, the low inductance of the primary coil means that the voltage across the capacitor initially matches the input voltage.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/Tesla_coil_3.svg

theres no image tags on this forum?

but yea what happens in this circuit?

I know what's supposed to happen is that the tank cap is supposed to charge until the gap breaks down and then you have an LC resonance circuit in the primary side that excites the LC circuit, composed of the coil inductor and the stray capacitance betwee nthe top load and ground, in the secondary.

lol run-on sentence.

what i don't understand is that if the capacitor charges to the voltage of the power supply, only, why would the gap breakdown due to the voltage across the cap and not the voltage across the power supply? isn't the voltage across the power supply the same voltage that will eventually be across the cap?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
In this case the high voltage power supply is the mains transformer, like from a neon sign or an ignition coil. And yes the voltage across them is the same, but these transformers are heavily insulated that prevent sparking. Without insulation, they spark like crazy and burn the dielectric.In theory, the cap and inductor form a voltage divider for the AC voltage, so AC wise the voltage across is less than input. But during the first AC (60 Hz) quarter cycle, voltage across the gap will reach a maximum and it begins to spark thus completing the DC circuit. During this time, energy stored in the cap will be dumped to the inductor back and forth at resonant frequency. In theory the voltage across the cap should be less than input, but given such low inductance, the initial voltage across cap will be same as input voltage.
 
Last edited:
waht said:
In this case the high voltage power supply is the mains transformer, like from a neon sign or an ignition coil. And yes the voltage across them is the same, but these transformers are heavily insulated that prevent sparking. Without insulation, they spark like crazy and burn the dielectric.In theory, the cap and inductor form a voltage divider for the AC voltage, so AC wise the voltage across
across what?
waht said:
is less than input. But during the first AC (60 Hz) quarter cycle, voltage across the gap will reach a maximum and it begins to spark thus completing the DC circuit.
i thought the cap discharging overvolted the gap
waht said:
During this time, energy stored in the cap will be dumped to the inductor back and forth at resonant frequency. In theory the voltage across the cap should be less than input, but given such low inductance, the initial voltage across cap will be same as input voltage.
no initially the voltage across the cap is zero in a capacitative circuit, one with low inductance
 
Last edited:
The primary coil inductor has low inductance therefore its reactance @ 60 Hz is so low you can call it a short. Therefore the 60 Hz voltage across the cap is the same as it is across the gap.
 
can someone give me some more assistance
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top