How Does a Zener Shunt Regulate for Drop in Voltage?

AI Thread Summary
A Zener shunt regulator does not compensate for a drop in input voltage; it requires the source voltage to remain above the Zener breakdown voltage for effective regulation. The design must include current limiting to prevent exceeding the Zener's power rating. In a typical setup, if the load current approaches the total current available (I(total)), regulation will fail. A drop in raw voltage results in a decrease in I(total), which means the load can draw less current before losing regulation. Therefore, maintaining a stable input voltage is crucial for the Zener shunt to function properly.
fonz
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
In a simple zener shunt circuit consisting of a zener diode in parallel to the input voltage and load how does the regulator compensate for a drop in input voltage?

In other words the zener will conduct or 'shunt' when the source voltage exceeds the breakdown voltage of the zener diode. How does it compensate for an drop in source voltage below nominal?

Regards
Dan
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
It doesn't. It's up to the designer to ensure the source voltage is always greater than the zener breakdown, if you want it to be regulated by that zener. Also ensure some current limiting so zener power rating is never reached.
 
In shunt regulator using zener, say you have a raw voltage of 10V and you put the -ve to ground and and resistor R from +10V to the anode of the zener or 5.1V. The current draw would be I(total)=(10-5.1)/R. If you use this to generate the 5.1V to drive, as long as the load don't draw close to I(total), then you get regulation. Once you draw more than I(total), the zener will turn off and you totally loss regulation.

With this same idea, if you raw voltage dip, then I(total) will drop, using the explanation above, you can draw less current before you loss regulation.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top