I How Does Aerobraking Work for the ExoMars Orbiter?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter sophiecentaur
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Aerobraking for the ExoMars orbiter involves initially placing the spacecraft in a highly elliptical orbit, where it uses atmospheric drag to reduce its orbital energy and circularize its path, saving fuel. Concerns were raised about the orbiter descending too low into the Martian atmosphere, potentially leading to a rapid loss of altitude. However, it was clarified that aerobraking can lower the maximum altitude while also allowing for maneuvers that can increase the minimum altitude, effectively using the atmosphere to adjust the orbit. The spacecraft can utilize specific angles during low passes to gain altitude, akin to skipping a stone on water. This method, while complex, is designed to maximize fuel efficiency for the mission.
sophiecentaur
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
30,063
Reaction score
7,374
I heard a talk from a fairly well informed guy about the exomars mission. He was saying that the orbiter will, initially have a very elliptical orbit and that it would be using aerobraking to make it circular (saving a lot of fuel). I have a problem understanding that because aerobraking can only remove energy and the resulting orbital height would (I reckon) bring the orbiter below the fringe of the Martian atmosphere. That would mean it would 'fall down' fairly soon.
I have to conclude that the aerobraking would only reduce the highest orbital distance to what was required and that some fuel would be used to raise the minimum distance out of the atmosphere. (Perigee and apogee terms only apply on Earth?). Someone here must have definitive answer to this. Am I right?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Something like this? - MGS Aerobraking.

brakeprof2.gif
 
Yes. Thank you. That shows a series of orbits with decreasing energy and I understand that process. However, if aerobraking can take place at that height, the drag (with or without the effect of the solar panels) will surely continue to take significant energy. So the lifetime of an orbit at that height will be limited. Is there a way to extract energy by aerobraking that will raise the minimum height as well as lowering the maximum height - away from the drag of the atmosphere?
 
Once it's at the lowest point, they use the rockets to add some kinetic energy and push it into a higher orbit away from the atmosphere. It's still a significant fuel savings.

The atmosphere itself can also be used to push it into a higher orbit. During one of the low passes, if the ship is oriented correctly and hit the atmosphere at the right angle, it can bounce off of it like a stone skipping off of the water. This can also be used to increase altitude.
 
newjerseyrunner said:
Once it's at the lowest point, they use the rockets to add some kinetic energy and push it into a higher orbit away from the atmosphere. It's still a significant fuel savings.

The atmosphere itself can also be used to push it into a higher orbit. During one of the low passes, if the ship is oriented correctly and hit the atmosphere at the right angle, it can bounce off of it like a stone skipping off of the water. This can also be used to increase altitude.
Thanks. Two good answers that I had wondered about.
Hope it all works as it seems like a bit of a shoestring project, compared with Curiosity.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top