How Does Aligning Water Dipoles Affect Surface Charge Density?

ResonantW
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Imagine that all the molecular dipoles in a cup of water could be made to point down. Calculate the magnitude of the resulting surface charge density at the upper surface of the water, and express it in electrons per square centimeter.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Can I just find the number of water molecules per square centimeter of area, knowing the approximate size of an H2O molecules, and then say that since all the dipoles point down we will have 2 electrons for every such molecule along the surface?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should approach it from the ideas developed in chapter 10. The text gives you the permanent dipole moment, p, of a water molecule. It also explains how to go from dipole moment per molecule to the polarization P. From P you can get the surface charge density. :smile:
 
Got it! Why wouldn't the first method work?

Also, do I know the volume density of water molecules, because that would be what Purcell calls N, correct?
 
ResonantW said:
Got it! Why wouldn't the first method work?

I don't think you can assume two electrons per molecule. The effective surface charge per surface molecule would depend on the amount of polarization of each molecule, p .
Also, do I know the volume density of water molecules, because that would be what Purcell calls N, correct?

Right. You'll need to determine N, the number water molecules per cm3. See if you can calculate it from the mass density of water and the molar mass of water.
 
I get that P= 6e22 esu/cm^2. Is that equivalent to the surface charge density?

I can also express this as 1.3e32 electrons per square centimeter.
 
ResonantW said:
I get that P= 6e22 esu/cm^2. Is that equivalent to the surface charge density?

I can also express this as 1.3e32 electrons per square centimeter.

I think you overlooked the caption for Fig. 10.14 which states that the dipole moments given in the figure are in units of ##10^{-18}## esu-cm. Otherwise, looks good.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top