How Does Ampere's Law Apply to an Infinite Sheet of Current?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Ampere's Law to determine the magnetic field above an infinite sheet of parallel wires carrying current in the y-direction. The magnetic field, expressed as a vector, is calculated to be B = -(μNI)/2a in the negative x-direction above the sheet. It is clarified that the magnetic field's direction is positive x above the xy-plane and negative x below it, with its magnitude independent of the x-coordinate. A suggestion is made to clarify the unit vector notation in the final expression to avoid misinterpretation. The correct understanding of the magnetic field's behavior is emphasized for accurate representation.
babydimples
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider an infinite sheet of parallel wires. The sheet lies in the xy
plane. A current I runs in the y-direction through each wire. there are
N/a wires per unit length in the x direction. Write an expression for B(d)
the magnetic field a distance d above the x y plane of the sheet and we
have to express the magnetic field as a vector.


Homework Equations



Ampere's Law --> closed integral of (Bdl) = uIencl

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that by using the right hand rule, the magnetic field would
pointing in the negative x direction if i pick a point above the surface.
Then I tried to figure out what Iencl is and I get I = (N/a)(a)(I) = NI
Then using ampere's law I get

B(top integral + bottom integral) = uNI
B(2a) = uNI
B= UNI/2a
and since the magnetic field is heading towards the negative x direction
I typed in B = -(uNI)/2a x


Please help! I don't know what I'm doing wrong! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
babydimples said:
I typed in B = -(uNI)/2a x
The magnetic field is in the positive x-direction above the xy plane and in the negative x- direction below the xy plane. Its magnitude does not depend on x. Maybe the x in your equation was meant to be a unit vector but that's not how it will be interpreted by anyone who reads it, including a machine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top