How Does an Impulse Affect the Motion of a Cube?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sabatier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Impulse
AI Thread Summary
An impulse applied to a free-floating uniform cube affects both its linear and angular motion. To analyze the cube's motion, one must calculate the velocity of the center of mass and the angular velocity, specifying the axis of rotation. The impulse of 3m will impart a linear velocity to the cube, while the inertia tensor will help determine the angular motion. Understanding these calculations is crucial for predicting the cube's behavior after the impulse. Properly applying these principles will clarify the cube's resulting motion.
sabatier
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I'd be grateful if someone could help me with the problem below:

A free-floating uniform cube with sides of length 2 is at rest,
aligned with the coordinate axes, when it is subjected to an
impulse along one edge of 3m, where m is its mass. What
is the effect on its motion? (Its inertia tensor is 2/3mI)

Do I calculate the angular velocity or what? And how?

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi sabatier! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(how can impulse have dimensions of mass? :confused:)

You have to calculate the velocity of the centre of mass, and the angular velocity (including specfiying the axis of rotation) relative to the centre of mass. :wink:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top