How Does Battery EMF Affect Power Dissipation in a DC Circuit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the power dissipation in a DC circuit involving two batteries with different EMFs, E1 and E2, where E2 is greater than E1. The key question is how to determine the rate at which electrical energy is converted to chemical energy in the smaller battery (E1) when connected in this configuration. The participant initially miscalculates the total power dissipated but later applies Kirchhoff's voltage law to derive the correct expression for energy conversion. After substituting the current into the equation, they conclude that the correct answer is (E2 - E1)*E1/2r, confirming option D as the solution. The reasoning is validated by the application of circuit analysis principles.
eprparadox
Messages
133
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The positive terminals of two batteries with emf’s of E1 and E2, respectively, are connected together. Here E2 > E1. The circuit is completed by connecting the negative terminals. If each battery has an internal resistance r, the rate with which electrical energy is converted to chemical energy in the smaller battery is:

A. E1^2/r
B. E1^2/2r
C. (E2 − E1)*E1/r
D. (E2 − E1)*E1/2r
E. E2^2/2r


Homework Equations


P = V^2/R


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not entirely sure how to analyze this. It seems to me that the power dissipated by the resistors if (E2 + E1)^2/2r. I know that's not what the question is asking for, but is that correct by itself? Whatever energy is created chemically will be dissipated in the internal resistance of the batteries.

Now, if I was subtract off the rate of chemical energy provided by the E2 (the larger) source, then I should get the remaining energy, which is that provided by the E1 (the smaller) source. This is probably all jibberish, but if anyone has any ideas pointing me in the right direction that'd be great.

Thanks a lot for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eprparadox said:
It seems to me that the power dissipated by the resistors if (E2 + E1)^2/2r. I know that's not what the question is asking for, but is that correct by itself?

You get E1+E2 when the positive terminal of one battery is connected to the negative terminal of the other. This is not the case here. Read the problem.
 
Alright, my fault. But I think I get it now.

So I ended up using kirchhoffs voltage law over the loop that would be if you were to draw this out and I came up with:

E2 - i*r - i*r - E1 = 0. I multiplied by i to both sides in order to get an energy (rate of energy) equation and I also brought the E1 to the other side because we're looking for the energy that E1 converts to chemical energy:

E2*i - 2*i^2*r = E2*i. Now, i is just equal to (E2 - E1) / 2*r. I substitute that in and get as an answer:

(E2 - E1)*E1 / *2r which is answer D. Does this reasoning sound ok?
 
Sounds OK.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top