How Does Beta Minus Decay Affect the Kinetic Energy of a Tin Nucleus?

omiros
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody, I am a first year student and I have a question that I am not sure if I can answer.

A radioactive isotope of Tin(50), with 85 neutrons in its nucleus and without any electrons bound to it, undergoes a beta minus decay. The electron pops into existence, 10-15m from the center of the nucleus (consider that the nucleus is uniformly charged), and it leaves with a speed of 0.999c.

(We consider Mn=Mp=1.6x10-27)

1. What is the final speed of, both the electron and the nucleus?

2. Will the the new nucleus, be able to bind the electron, into one of its orbits?

Tips: The new nucleus will have 51 protons and 84 neutrons.

The atom is a hydrogen like one, so we can find the probable bound energies through the Bohr model. (We don't care about its angular distribution)

The kinetic energy of the electron has to be calculated through the K = (γ-1)mc2
and the potential energy from the Coulomb law U = -Ze2/(4πε0r).

I assume that the energy levels will be 51x13.6/n2eV.

So the hard part, is the equation of potential-kinetic energy with two varying speeds, that can give us the result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"two varying speeds"?
Did you compare the kinetic energy of the electron to its potential energy?

(consider that the nucleus is uniformly charged)
That could indicate that you have to take the finite size of the nucleus into account. Do you know models about the size of nuclei?
 
mfb said:
"two varying speeds"?
Did you compare the kinetic energy of the electron to its potential energy?

No. I am just saying that, as the electron is travelling, it is 'pulling' the nucleus with it. A positive and a negative charge, that are getting separated (cause of the moving electron and the stationary, at the beginning nucleus.)

mfb said:
That could indicate that you have to take the finite size of the nucleus into account. Do you know models about the size of nuclei?

Personally I do not. However I am thinking of it as : It is of a finite size and quite small. 10-15m, is its whole length.
 
omiros said:
No.
Well that would be interesting!

Personally I do not. However I am thinking of it as : It is of a finite size and quite small. 10-15m, is its whole length.
In that case, the electron would "appear" (directly) outside the nucleus, and the given uniform charge distribution in the nucleus would not matter.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top