How Does Changing Phase Affect Water Wave Interference Patterns?

AI Thread Summary
When two point sources produce circular water waves, changing their phase from 0 degrees to 180 degrees alters the interference pattern significantly. At 0 degrees, the waves are in phase, resulting in maximum amplitude and constructive interference where their peaks align. Conversely, at 180 degrees, the waves are out of phase, leading to minimum amplitude and destructive interference as peaks align with troughs. While the overall pattern transitions from bright and dark fringes to a more uniform distribution, the fringe spacing remains constant, determined by the wavelength and source distance. Thus, the interference pattern's amplitude and appearance change with phase, but certain characteristics like fringe spacing do not.
ckjacky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Heres the situation,
You have 2 point sources producing circular water waves, in which the phase is adjustable.
The question is In what respects does the interference pattern change and in what respects does it stay constant when the relative phase of your sources changes from 0 degrees to 180 degrees?

From my testbook I know that 180 degrees means out of phase... but I still don't know how to answer this question. All I know is that the answer should deal with those nodal lines.

Can anyone please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WHen the two sources are in-phase, what sort of interference (constructive or destructive) would you get along the line through teh center? If the two sources went out 180 degrees out of phase (this means 1/2 cycle out of phase, or in other words, totaly out of phase) then the type of interference along the central line would be completely the opposite. Instead of maximum intensity, you would get...

How about the higher order mins and maxes. What would happen to each "constructive interference" zone?
 

When the relative phase of the two sources is 0 degrees, meaning they are in phase, the interference pattern will have a maximum amplitude at the point where the waves overlap. This is because the peaks of one wave align with the peaks of the other wave, creating constructive interference. However, as the relative phase is changed to 180 degrees, the two waves will be completely out of phase and the interference pattern will have a minimum amplitude at the point of overlap. This is because the peaks of one wave align with the troughs of the other wave, creating destructive interference.

Additionally, as the relative phase changes from 0 to 180 degrees, the interference pattern will transition from having a series of bright fringes (areas of constructive interference) and dark fringes (areas of destructive interference) to having a uniform pattern of alternating bright and dark fringes. This is because as the phase difference increases, the waves will go through more cycles and the bright and dark fringes will overlap, creating a more uniform pattern.

However, there are also certain aspects of the interference pattern that will remain constant regardless of the relative phase. For example, the distance between the bright fringes (known as the fringe spacing) will remain the same regardless of the phase difference. This is because the fringe spacing is determined by the wavelength of the waves and the distance between the two sources, which does not change.

In conclusion, the interference pattern will change in terms of the amplitude and the overall pattern of bright and dark fringes as the relative phase is adjusted from 0 to 180 degrees. However, certain aspects such as the fringe spacing will remain constant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top