How Does Compound Interest Affect Birthday Savings Over 20 Years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnny Leong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total value of savings from $10 deposited each year for 20 years at a 3% compound interest rate. Initial calculations yielded different results, with one user arriving at approximately $269 and another at $286.76, leading to confusion over whether the final year should include an additional deposit. Clarification revealed that the last deposit occurs on the 20th birthday, meaning no new funds are added on the 21st birthday. Ultimately, the correct formula for the total value, considering the compounding interest and deposits, results in approximately $276.
Johnny Leong
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Question:
A man puts $10 in the bank for his son on each of his birthdays from the first to the twentieth inclusive. If the money accumlates at 3% compound interest, what is the toatl value on the son's twenty-first birthday?

My answer is like this:
a = 10, r = 1.03, n = 20
Total value = a * (r^n - 1) / (r - 1) = 10 * (1.03^20 - 1) / 0.03 = 269 (approx.)

But the answer is 276, what is the problem?
The $10 of the first year will immediately be counted for interest or not? And also how to define the final year, it is the 20th year or the 21st year?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmmmm

I just did it in a spreadsheet, and I got $286.76, which doesn't match either answer.

I used Microsoft Works, so I am prepared to blame Bill Gates if my answer is wrong.

Aha! Maybe he doesn't put $10 in on the 21st birthday, so subtract $10.00 from $286.76, and you get $276.76. Yeah, I think that's what is going on. That last year the account grows, but no new principle is put into the account.
 
Last edited:
Janitor, the original problem said "A man puts $10 in the bank for his son on each of his birthdays from the first to the twentieth inclusive" so there is no "maybe" about it.

Johnny Leong, you have the formula wrong. The sum of the geometric series \Sigma_{i=0}^n{ar^i} is a\frac{1-r^{n+1}}{1-r}, not a\frac{1-r^n}{1-r}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it just me or are you all missing something?

If the "man puts $10 in the bank for his son on each of his birthdays", then the series should be defined like this:

a_0 = 0
a_{n+1} = a_n 1.03 + 10

And if that is the case, the series is no longer purely geometric so the formula above cannot be used to calculate the sum.
 
Chen, that means on the son's first birthday. He has $10 and on his 21st birthday, he will be having a21 = 1.03 * a20, don't have another $10 added.
The expanded form of a21 = 1.03 * (10 + 1.03 * 10 + 1.03^2 * 10 + ... + 1.03^19 * 10) = 10 * (1.03^21 - 1) / (1.03 - 1) - 10 = 276.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top