How Does Dark Matter Avoid Gravitational Collapse?

AI Thread Summary
Dark matter's inability to lose energy through radiation suggests it does not undergo gravitational collapse like baryonic matter. Research indicates that at large scales, cold dark matter and normal matter behave similarly, with overdensities collapsing under certain conditions. The transition from linear to nonlinear structure formation is described using the Zeldovich Approximation. While both types of matter can be analyzed with similar methods, the interaction of normal matter complicates the dynamics at galaxy cluster scales. Understanding these concepts requires delving into advanced cosmological theories and literature.
moving finger
Messages
1,689
Reaction score
1
Does anyone know of any work that has been done on the possible theoretical physics/mechanics of Dark Matter, for example if Dark Matter cannot lose energy by radiation then it presumably cannot undergo gravitational collapse in the same was as baryonic matter? A layperson's guide would be nice!

Thanks

MF
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
moving finger said:
Does anyone know of any work that has been done on the possible theoretical physics/mechanics of Dark Matter, for example if Dark Matter cannot lose energy by radiation then it presumably cannot undergo gravitational collapse in the same was as baryonic matter? A layperson's guide would be nice!

Hmm, I don't know if such a thing exists, unfortunately. The aspects in which this has been explored are largely in the context of the growth of structure in the universe, and everything I've seen on that is pretty technical (for example, Liddle & Lyth). I can briefly summarize the ideas.

At very large scales, when the matter is far too diffuse to be radiating, then cold dark matter and normal matter act in pretty much the same way. That is, the overdensities collapse and can be treated with linear perturbation theory. When the density in a region exceeds the background density (approximated by the critical density) by of order unity, then it becomes "nonlinear", meaning it can no longer be simply treated by linear perturbation theory. At this point, we often use the "Zeldovich Approximation", a simple mathematical trick that allows us to explore the evolution of slightly non-linear structures.

At the present time (and at most times in the universe) there are scales on which large scale structure is linear and scales on which it's non-linear. The extent to which the universe is clumped on different scales is described by the power spectrum. Overdensities of a very large size are very slow to grow, so they will still be linear in the present day, while overdensities of very small size (like clusters), have long since undergone non-linear collapse. This is the fundamental idea behind "bottom-up" structure formation, that smaller things form first and combine to form larger things.

Everything I've described up to now applies to both cold dark and normal matter. Once the overdensities collapses to galaxy cluster scales, however, the normal matter begins to interact with itself in ways other than gravitationally. If it weren't for this evolution of the baryons, then the distribution of cold dark matter could probably be described fairly simply, but it is unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on your point of view) coupled gravitationally to the normal matter. This complicates things to the point where I don't think I could give a simple conceptual explanation. However, the clumping and evolution of small haloes (a term used to describe dark matter overdensities) is treated approximately by the Press-Schechter theory.

Anyway, if you're interested in any of the above topics, you can try google searches on some of the key concepts (like the power spectrum, press-schechter, zeldovich, etc.). I can refer you to various books on this sort of cosmology, but I wouldn't really recommend any of them for the amateur. The one I mentioned at the beginning is probably the best for the pedagogy, but it would still take a lot of work to understand.
 
That's great, thank you!
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top