How does decompression affect the number of particles in a confined gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter intervoxel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on modeling the decompression of an ideal gas confined in a cubic volume within an infinitely long box. The user has derived a formula for the time it takes individual particles to reach the barrier at x=L, based on their initial positions and velocities. They seek to establish a function n(t) that quantifies the number of particles remaining in the original volume over time, dependent on the total number of particles, the box size, average particle speed, and time. However, there is uncertainty regarding the mechanism that affects n(t), and suggestions are made to consider using a spherical volume for the model instead of a cubic one. The problem requires further clarification for a more comprehensive solution.
intervoxel
Messages
192
Reaction score
1
Hi,
I'm trying to assemble a function describing the decompression of an ideal gas in a infinitely long box of side L. The gas is initially confined in a volume L^3 at one end.

So far I got the following formula which gives the time the i-th particle takes to reach the barrier at x=L:

<br /> t_i = \frac{2 L - x_i}{\overline{v} \cos(a_i)}<br />

where

x_i is a random variable between 0 and L
a_i is a random variable between 0 and \pi /2
\overline{v} is the average speed of a gas particle

What I need is n(t) = f(N, L, \overline{v},t)

where

N is the total number of particles
n(t) is the the number of particles in the original volume L^3 after time t

Please, help. I'm stuck a long time in this.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I do not see a mechanism which could change ##n(t)##. Also it might be reasonable to work with a ball instead of a cube. As given, the problem is insufficiently explained.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top