How Does Doubling Mechanical Energy Affect Amplitude?

twiztdlogik
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
what happens to the amplitude if total mechanical energy doubles?

i thought, if there was enough mechanical energy in the spring, the amplitude would be at its maximum... like it would have stretched as far as it could, so doubling the total mechanical energy, would only make the periods shorter, and the amplitude stays the same.

if this is right or wrong, can anyone please let me know!??!?

Cheers,
KC
 
Physics news on Phys.org
twiztdlogik said:
what happens to the amplitude if total mechanical energy doubles?

Hi KC! :smile:

Hint: mechanical energy = KE + spring energy.

So when is the KE = 0?

and how does the spring energy relate to the length? :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top