How Does Entropy Relate to the Arrangement Factor in Statistical Mechanics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
AI Thread Summary
Entropy relates to the arrangement factor in statistical mechanics through the concept of microstates and probabilities of different configurations. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the calculation of probabilities and arrangement factors for different energy levels, specifically addressing the most probable distribution and its implications for entropy. The arrangement factor, W, represents the number of possible arrangements of particles in a given state, which is crucial for understanding the Boltzmann distribution. Clarification is sought on the relationship between these probabilities, arrangement factors, and entropy, indicating a need for deeper understanding of the underlying principles. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of relating statistical mechanics concepts to entropy calculations.
bobey
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
based on this question :

http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz175/bobey/blablabal.jpg"

i tried to answer the question as follow :

My answer for the first part of the question :

http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz175/bobey/black.jpg"

My answer for the second part of the question :

http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz175/bobey/blackfffff.jpg"


The assumption is bad. This is because the most probable distribution will effectively count, in this case the {4,1,0,1,0} state is the most probable state, and we will have S=k ln WD*., where WD* is 30.

my problem is really i didn't understand the last part of the question...this is my other attempt for the second part:
Since all the states are equiprobable to occur, the probability of the 1st level is 1/6 x 5 = 5/6 and the probability of the 5th level is 1/6 x 1 = 1/6 while the arrangement factor, W for the 1st level is (6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2)/5! = 6 and the arrangement factor, W for the 5th level is = 6!/1! = 720... is that means the probability for 1st level is 6/726 and the probability for the 5th level is 720/726? i get confuse with the earlier probability and the arrangement factor? what it has to be related with entropy? anyone can clarify it?

and the arrangement factor = probabalility iff all the molecules are at T = 0 which means S = 0... based on the example. probability = 1/6 x 6 = 1 and the arrangement factor, W = 6! / 6! = 1...

is my understanding towards the question is correct or I just misunderstanding it?
ANYONE CAN CLARIFY IT? PLZ3X
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The arrangement factor just gives you the number of possible arrangements (microstates) given a set of assumptions (in this case, the ones used to derive Boltzmann statistics). I'm not sure I get the last question either. Given how the arrangement factor is described here, this is will lead to a Boltzmann distribution in a system where there's no degeneracy. The probability of a particle being in state i (energy level i) is given by:

P_i = (n_i/N) = \frac{g_i e^{-E_i/K_b T}}{Z}
where:
Z = \sum_{i=0}^{4} g_i e^{-E_i/K_b T}

T is the temperature, Kb is the Boltzmann constant, Ei is the energy of the ith state and gi is the degeneracy of the ith state (always = 1 in your case).

EDIT: W8, I was wronng. I'll get back to this ASAP. I do hope this helps in the meanwhile. I have to be honest and say I don't get what you're doing to compute those probabilities. Could you explain it?
 
Last edited:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top