How Does Flux Distribute in a Gaussian Cube with a Corner Charge?

AI Thread Summary
A charge q placed at a corner of a Gaussian cube leads to a complex flux distribution through the cube's faces. The solution involves surrounding the charge with eight cubes, allowing for the calculation of flux through individual faces. Each face receives a flux of 1/24 * q/ε₀, derived from the symmetry of the arrangement. The confusion arises from the assumption that the three opposite faces should have zero flux, despite the contributions from the surrounding cubes. Ultimately, the flux through the three remote faces is confirmed to be 1/8 of the total flux, aligning with Gauss's Law.
quantum13
Messages
65
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle charge of q is placed at one corner of a Gaussian cube. What multiple of q/\epsilon_0 gives the flux though each cube face not making up that corner?

The solution is amazing - stack up eight cubes around the corner and find the flux through each individual cube and individual face of the cube
<br /> (1/8 * 1/3) q/\epsilon_0 = 1/24 * q/\epsilon_0<br />

However, I don't see how this makes sense. There is no charge included in the three opposite faces of the cubes meaning there should be no flux there, even though there definitely is flux from the stacked cubes method. How can this contradiction be explained?

Homework Equations


Gauss's Law

The Attempt at a Solution



Uh.. ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whew, confusing to say "q is placed at one corner of a Gaussian cube".
Leave out the word Gaussian for this cube!
The Gaussian surface you must consider is the outside surface of the set of 8 cubes surrounding q. From symmetry, you get the same flux through all the outside faces of those 8 cubes as through the three remote faces of that first cube. Looks like the Gaussian surface has 24 faces so each one gets 1/24 of the flux. And you are asked for the flux through 3 of those.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top