How Does Force Convert to Energy in Electromagnetism?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShayanJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Force Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between force and energy in electromagnetism, specifically proving that the work done by the force \(\vec{F}=I \vec{dl} \times \vec{B}\) is equal to \(\delta W=I \delta \phi\). The calculation involves the scalar triple product and the rearrangement of terms to demonstrate that \(\delta W = I \vec{\delta r} \times \vec{\delta l} \cdot \vec{B}\). The proof concludes that the work done is directly related to the change in magnetic flux, \(\delta \Phi = \vec{\delta S} \cdot \vec{B}\), confirming the relationship between force and energy in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetism principles, specifically force and magnetic flux.
  • Familiarity with vector calculus, including cross products and dot products.
  • Knowledge of scalar triple products and their properties.
  • Basic concepts of electric circuits and current flow.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of scalar triple products in vector calculus.
  • Learn about magnetic flux and its applications in electromagnetism.
  • Explore the implications of the Lorentz force law in circuit analysis.
  • Investigate the relationship between work, energy, and magnetic fields in dynamic systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, electrical engineers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of the interplay between force and energy in magnetic fields.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
One of the problems in my textbook of electromagnetism is about proving that the work done by the force \vec{F}=I \vec{dl} \times \vec{B},is \delta W=I \delta \phi where the circuit isn't rigid and the displacement vector of the element of interest is \vec{\delta r} with a constant current and \delta \phi is the change in magnetic flux.My calculation is as follows:
<br /> \delta W=\vec{F}\cdot \vec{\delta r}=I (\vec{dl}\times \vec{B})\cdot \vec{\delta r}=I[ \delta x (dy B_z-dz B_y)+...]=I[(\delta x dy-\delta y dx)B_z+..]<br />
To complete the proof,I should be able to set \delta A_z=\delta x dy-\delta y dx,etc.(\delta A_z being the change in area caused by B_z).My problem is,I don't know how to justify it!
Any ideas?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are (correctly) trying to evaluate is a scalar triple product. You can cyclically shift the terms round (look it up, say, in Wiki) so that the cross-product is of the dl and dr vectors, giving you a directed area... Then use the definition of phi...
 
Did you succeed? This is what I had in mind...

\delta W = \vec{F}.\vec{\delta r} = I \vec{\delta l}\times \vec{B}.\vec{\delta r}

[This is unambiguous without brackets. The cross product has to be executed first, because if we tried to do the dot product, \vec{B}.\vec{\delta r}, first, it would yield a scalar, rendering the cross product meaningless.]

We are allowed to re-arrange this scalar triple product cyclically...

\delta W = I \vec{\delta r} \times \vec {\delta l}. \vec{B}.

Now, \vec{\delta r} \times \vec {\delta l} is easily shown to be a vector \vec{\delta S} of magnitude equal to the area swept our by \delta l, and directed normally to this area..

But, by definition of flux, \delta \Phi = \vec{\delta S}.\vec B

Thus we have \delta W = I \Phi as required.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K