How does friction work on a smooth slope with rough contacts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shalikadm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Works
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about friction on a smooth slope with rough contacts, two scenarios are analyzed. In the first situation, both contact surfaces are rough, allowing static friction between the blocks A and B to cancel out the friction from the ground, enabling them to move together at a constant speed. In the second scenario, with A on a smooth slope and B rough, both blocks accelerate together due to gravity without friction between them, as there is no relative motion. The key point is that the acceleration of both blocks is the same because they are treated as a single system under the influence of gravity, leading to no frictional forces acting between them. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the role of friction in different contact conditions.
shalikadm
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
I am trying to figure out what happens here...and now I've stuck on this...
Here it goes...,

situation 1
Untitled.png

Both contact A with B and A with ground are rough
We increase the force P applied here from zero.When there's sufficiently big μs between A and B than that of A and ground,there's an ability there to move both A and B together at the same speed.What I see here is that there's a friction there even they are moved by the force at a regular velocity.When A travels at a regular speed there must be a force applied on this to cancel out the friction on A by the ground.Actually its the friction applied by B on A that cancels out the friction by ground on A.So there must be a friction between A and B when even traveling at a regular velocity.Am I correct ?

situation 2
Untitledwerwer.png

Contact of A with B are rough.BUT A with ground is smooth.
A and B is put in a smooth slope as shown in the image.When we take both A and B together as a one system,there's no friction (friction s between A and B cancels when taken together as one system). So the only force is the resolution of weight parallel to the slope.So the acceleration on this system is gsinθ..Here's where I can't proceed on.We have told that there isn't a friction between A and B when they are going down the slope.The reason that was told for this is that the resolution of weight of B parallel to the slope is used for to keep the gsinθ acceleration parallel to the slope.So there's no any effort of B to slide on A-so there's no friction between them.But to explain this to my self I want to know that B 's acceleration is gsinθ.Is there someone who can explain me how B get an acceleration of gsinθ.I'm afraid to think that the acceleration of B is same as the whole system..I see acceleration is a vector...so aA+aB=asystem like thing is haunting my mind...We see such things in vectors like momentum...momentums of objects of a system is added to the momentum of system (algebraically as a vector)..So in bomb explosion the momentum of the system is zero...like that thing...please explain this to me...

Please try to give me a short and clear explanation(a best one)..
I'm in a hurry
Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When A travels at a regular speed there must be a force applied on this to cancel out the friction on A by the ground.Actually its the friction applied by B on A that cancels out the friction by ground on A.So there must be a friction between A and B when even traveling at a regular velocity.Am I correct ?

Yes. It's the static friction between B and A. They aren't moving with respect to each other.

Situation 2 is different to situation 1. In situation 1 the force P is only acting on block B. In situation 2 the "force" (acceleration) of gravity is acting equally on both blocks. Their acceleration and velocity is the same. There is no force causing one block to move (or try to move) relative to the other. So no frictional forces between them.

The acceleration is the same for A and B for the same reason as this..



If you tied the feather to the hammer they would still fall at the same rate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a lot Cwatters !
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top