How does gravity get out of a black hole?

AI Thread Summary
Gravity does not need to "escape" from a black hole because it is a field that exists due to the mass present, not something that propagates outward. When a star collapses into a black hole, the gravitational field at a distance decreases as mass is lost during the supernova, but the field remains strong near the black hole. As mass accumulates and compresses into a black hole, the gravitational field increases due to the mass being closer to the center. The gravitational field surrounding a black hole operates similarly to that around other celestial bodies, like Earth or the Sun. The curvature of spacetime, described by a metric tensor in General Relativity, inherently creates the gravitational field without needing to communicate with the mass at the center.
nburns
Messages
32
Reaction score
3
Forgive me if this is a dumb question. If nothing gets out of a black hole, how does the gravity get out?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
nburns said:
Forgive me if this is a dumb question. If nothing gets out of a black hole, how does the gravity get out?
This is a very common question and the answer is not obvious. Remember that gravity is a field.

Basically, gravitational fields don't "propagate" after they are formed, but the CHANGE in the field does propagate as the field is forming. Let's consider two ways of a black hole forming.

First, A star explodes in a supernova and leaves a black hole. The gravity field of the star, at a point some distance removed from it is actually decreased because some of the star is blown away in the explosion of the supernova. The remaining field, at that same distance, is actually weaker. BUT, the gravity field still exists and in close to what is now a black hole, the field is quite strong. Had the entire mass of the star compacted down to a tiny size, the field strength at the farther distance would be the same, but now you can get in closer to the center of mass and the field is strong. How did the gravitational field of the star get as strong as it is in the first place? Same was as in the following case:

Second, a mass accumulates, enough to finally compress into a black hole. I don't know if this actually happens except in the rare case of more mass being added to a neutron star but it is a VERY informative case to look at. AS the mass coalesces, the gravitational field continues to increase at a given distance from the center of mass because more mass is now closer to the center than that point is. So the gravitational field continues to increase as the mass increases, and even after it becomes a black hole, at some distance out from the event horizon, the field is just the size that it would be if the same amount of mass were there but not a black hole.

So gravitational fields surround a black hole for exactly the same reason that they surround the Earth or the sun or any other celestial object.
 
  • Like
Likes Vishakha and NigelB
Thanks for your answer. So you are saying that, basically, the gravitational field surrounding the black hole doesn't need to "communicate" (for lack of a better word) with the mass at its center as long as the field isn't changing?
 
Remember that in GR the gravitational field is described by a metric tensor. It is the curvature of this metric that gives rise to gravity. There's no need for gravity to 'get out' of the black hole because it is this metric that's curving to create the black hole in the first place!
 
Does the same logic apply to magnetic fields of black holes?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Back
Top