How Does Gravity Influence Ring Structures and Tidal Effects?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hexx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Thoughts
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the influence of gravity on ring structures and tidal effects, exploring theoretical concepts and humorous ideas related to gravity manipulation and structural integrity. Participants engage in a mix of speculative reasoning and light-hearted commentary.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the feasibility of lifting one person while in mid-air, citing Newton's third law of motion, which suggests that any force exerted would result in an equal and opposite reaction.
  • Humorous references to flying techniques, including a quote from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," suggest unconventional methods of overcoming gravity.
  • One participant proposes a theoretical scenario involving a monorail-like track around the Earth, questioning the structural integrity if support beams were removed simultaneously.
  • Another participant suggests that the gravitational pull might vary based on the density of water, raising questions about how this could affect the design of a floating ring structure.
  • There are suggestions for incorporating a system to balance the ring structure with water and gravity sensors, indicating a consideration of tidal effects in the design.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of the proposed ideas, with some expressing skepticism about the practicality of lifting mechanisms and others engaging in speculative designs for ring structures. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the effects of gravity on proposed structures and the implications of tidal forces, indicating that assumptions about gravitational pull and structural balance are not fully explored.

Hexx
1288026580322.jpg


1288025340936.jpg


1288026369189.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is going to sound unintellectual, but how is this not possible?
 
1288027526683.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1288027635739.jpg
    1288027635739.jpg
    62.6 KB · Views: 516
Hexx said:
Step three is impossible. Person one cannot exert a force on person two without experiencing an equal but opposite force themselves. In other words, if person one attempts to lift person two whilst in mid-air, person one will accelerate downwards whilst person two accelerates upwards - the two people would then lose contact making step four impossible.

Similar reasoning applies to the other two examples.
 
Hootenanny said:
Step three is impossible. Person one cannot exert a force on person two without experiencing an equal but opposite force themselves. In other words, if person one attempts to lift person two whilst in mid-air, person one will accelerate downwards whilst person two accelerates upwards - the two people would then lose contact making step four impossible.

Similar reasoning applies to the other two examples.

have you tried?
 
Everyone whose read the bible (The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy) knows that the secret to flying is to throw yourself at the ground, and miss.
 
Hexx said:
have you tried?
No. As I explained above, any attempt would be futile. This is not something that needs to verified experimentally - it cannot be done.
 
Hootenanny said:
This is not something that needs to verified experimentally.
I take it you are a mathematician. The way to fly is to have an magnet in one hand held high and a piece of iron in the other hand held low. The magnet will pull the iron up. As long as you keep your arms stiff, you will be pulled up with it.
 
Jimmy Snyder said:
I take it you are a mathematician. The way to fly is to have an magnet in one hand held high and a piece of iron in the other hand held low. The magnet will pull the iron up. As long as you keep your arms stiff, you will be pulled up with it.
I am indeed (an applied one at least) - what gave me away? :rolleyes:

Just to clarify, this was posted in General Physics when I replied and not General Discussion. So if my response seemed pompous - that's why! :smile:
 
  • #10
really, i know this sounds odd in a physics discussion here..
but those were freaking HILARIOUS!

:smile::smile::smile:
 
  • #11
I like the one where you build a monorail-like track all the way around the Earth, then take out all the support beams all at the same time, giving Earth a floating ring.
 
  • #12
Those means of beating gravity will fail because Netwon ruined them long ago. Fortunately there are other means. One can exploit the law that a cat always lands on its feet and a buttered toast always land on the butter side
Anti-gravity.gif

I am not a mathematician, but since I am stuck in the US, I am lost in endless negotiations with PETA to publish the results.
 

Attachments

  • Anti-gravity.gif
    Anti-gravity.gif
    42.5 KB · Views: 462
  • #13
haha^^
:smile::smile:
 
  • #14
leroyjenkens said:
I like the one where you build a monorail-like track all the way around the Earth, then take out all the support beams all at the same time, giving Earth a floating ring.

That is theoretically correct, right? (Serious question).

The ocean side of the Earth might have less gravitational pull due to less density of water), but that we could adjust in the beam mass.
 
  • #15
jobyts said:
we could adjust in the beam mass.
How about tides ?
 
  • #16
humanino said:
How about tides ?

Make it hollow and fill it partly with water. Implement an advanced system which corrigates the amount of water in each part of the section needed to be in perfect balance.
 
  • #17
humanino said:
How about tides ?

Even if the ring is not adjusted for the gravity, only one point of the ring would be touching the earth, correct?

We can have gravity sensors all over the ring, and do some floating mass to balance the ring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K