How Does Gravity Influence Ring Structures and Tidal Effects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hexx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the impossibility of one person lifting another while both are in mid-air, emphasizing that any force exerted will result in an equal and opposite reaction, causing both individuals to lose contact. This principle is reiterated with examples, asserting that such actions cannot be experimentally verified as they defy fundamental physics. Participants humorously reference fictional concepts from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," suggesting that flying involves "throwing oneself at the ground and missing." Other whimsical ideas include using magnets to achieve lift and constructing a monorail around the Earth, though these concepts are met with skepticism regarding their feasibility. The conversation touches on theoretical adjustments to gravitational effects, such as using water to balance structures, but remains grounded in the acknowledgment of Newtonian physics as a barrier to these imaginative scenarios.
Hexx
1288026580322.jpg


1288025340936.jpg


1288026369189.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is going to sound unintellectual, but how is this not possible?
 
1288027526683.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 1288027635739.jpg
    1288027635739.jpg
    62.6 KB · Views: 500
Hexx said:
Step three is impossible. Person one cannot exert a force on person two without experiencing an equal but opposite force themselves. In other words, if person one attempts to lift person two whilst in mid-air, person one will accelerate downwards whilst person two accelerates upwards - the two people would then lose contact making step four impossible.

Similar reasoning applies to the other two examples.
 
Hootenanny said:
Step three is impossible. Person one cannot exert a force on person two without experiencing an equal but opposite force themselves. In other words, if person one attempts to lift person two whilst in mid-air, person one will accelerate downwards whilst person two accelerates upwards - the two people would then lose contact making step four impossible.

Similar reasoning applies to the other two examples.

have you tried?
 
Everyone whose read the bible (The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy) knows that the secret to flying is to throw yourself at the ground, and miss.
 
Hexx said:
have you tried?
No. As I explained above, any attempt would be futile. This is not something that needs to verified experimentally - it cannot be done.
 
Hootenanny said:
This is not something that needs to verified experimentally.
I take it you are a mathematician. The way to fly is to have an magnet in one hand held high and a piece of iron in the other hand held low. The magnet will pull the iron up. As long as you keep your arms stiff, you will be pulled up with it.
 
Jimmy Snyder said:
I take it you are a mathematician. The way to fly is to have an magnet in one hand held high and a piece of iron in the other hand held low. The magnet will pull the iron up. As long as you keep your arms stiff, you will be pulled up with it.
I am indeed (an applied one at least) - what gave me away? :rolleyes:

Just to clarify, this was posted in General Physics when I replied and not General Discussion. So if my response seemed pompous - that's why! :smile:
 
  • #10
really, i know this sounds odd in a physics discussion here..
but those were freaking HILARIOUS!

:smile::smile::smile:
 
  • #11
I like the one where you build a monorail-like track all the way around the Earth, then take out all the support beams all at the same time, giving Earth a floating ring.
 
  • #12
Those means of beating gravity will fail because Netwon ruined them long ago. Fortunately there are other means. One can exploit the law that a cat always lands on its feet and a buttered toast always land on the butter side
Anti-gravity.gif

I am not a mathematician, but since I am stuck in the US, I am lost in endless negotiations with PETA to publish the results.
 

Attachments

  • Anti-gravity.gif
    Anti-gravity.gif
    42.5 KB · Views: 450
  • #13
haha^^
:smile::smile:
 
  • #14
leroyjenkens said:
I like the one where you build a monorail-like track all the way around the Earth, then take out all the support beams all at the same time, giving Earth a floating ring.

That is theoretically correct, right? (Serious question).

The ocean side of the Earth might have less gravitational pull due to less density of water), but that we could adjust in the beam mass.
 
  • #15
jobyts said:
we could adjust in the beam mass.
How about tides ?
 
  • #16
humanino said:
How about tides ?

Make it hollow and fill it partly with water. Implement an advanced system which corrigates the amount of water in each part of the section needed to be in perfect balance.
 
  • #17
humanino said:
How about tides ?

Even if the ring is not adjusted for the gravity, only one point of the ring would be touching the earth, correct?

We can have gravity sensors all over the ring, and do some floating mass to balance the ring.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top