I How does handedness get preserved in this situation?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter newjerseyrunner
  • Start date Start date
newjerseyrunner
Messages
1,532
Reaction score
637
In this video it's explained that neutrinos always travel related to the direction of their spin. But neutrinos don't travel at the speed of light, so it's possible to outrun it.

That means from the point of view of earth, a solar neutrino is moving in one direction. But to a higher energy neutrino chasing it, it's moving in the opposite direction.

So does spin change based on frame of reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mixing several concepts, spin, helicity and chirality. For a massive particle, only spin is conserved while helicity and chirality aren't. Also helicity and chirality don't coincide. For a massless particle, spin is not well defined (as it is angular momentum in the rest frame, which does not exist for a massless particle), while helicity and chirality coincide.
So yes, you can outrun a neutrino and change its helicity.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart and newjerseyrunner
I'm confused, the video seemed to only mention quantum spin. Was this a mistake? The guys a nuclear phycisist at fermilabs, seems unlikely that he'd make a mistake like that.
 
Expecting a complete description in a nine minute video is unrealistic.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'

Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'

Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
View full post »

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Similar threads

I A test for a superluminal neutrino?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I How Does Beta Decay Relate to the Role of W Bosons in Weak Nuclear Force?
Replies
4
Views
4K
I How do the collider experiments measure the mass of the W boson?
Replies
4
Views
4K
I Does the Chirality match the helicity?
Replies
10
Views
3K
Some words on neutrino physics?
Replies
4
Views
2K
How can I calculate the speed of a π+ meson based on its decay distance?
Replies
24
Views
3K
Weak Isospin, Chirality and Helicity
Replies
9
Views
3K
I Strange quarks, Strange stars and Strangelets?
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Concentrated arcs in bubble chamber photos
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Weyl Spinors & Helicity: Explained
Replies
4
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top