How Does Hausdorff Distance Determine Equality of Compact Sets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter diracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
diracy
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a compact set A\subset\Re^{n} and a point x\in\Re^{n} define the distance from x to A as the quantity:

d(x, A)=inf({\left\|x-y\right\|: y\inA})

Given two compact sets A, B \subset\Re^{n}, define the Hausdorff distance between them to be:

d(A, B)=max(sup{d(x, B) : x\inA}, sup{d(x, A) : x\inB})

a. For any compact set A, prove that the function f : \Re^{n}\rightarrow\Re given by: f(x)=d(x, A) is continuous.

b. For any two compact sets A, B it's true that: d(A, B)<\infty

c. For any two compact sets A, B it's true that d(A, B)=0 if and only if A=B.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I think I handled part a. I'm just completely lost on b and c. Any help?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The \left\ and \right\ should be norm.
 
Edited for a typo.
 
For (b), you need to show that

\sup_{x\in A}{d(x,B)}

is bounded and equivalently that

\sup_{x\in B}{d(x,A)}

is bounded. Now, can you use (a) to show this?
 
micromass said:
For (b), you need to show that

\sup_{x\in A}{d(x,B)}

is bounded and equivalently that

\sup_{x\in B}{d(x,A)}

is bounded. Now, can you use (a) to show this?

I got it! I really appreciate the help. I have one more question.

How do I show the following:

For any three compact sets: A, B, C we have a triangle inequality: d(A, C)\leq d(A,B) + d(B, C)
 
Let

a(A,B)=\sup_{a\in A}{d(a,B)}

(then d(A,B)=\max{a(A,B),a(B,A)}).

Try to show first that

a(A,B)\leq a(A,C)+a(C,B)

Thus, show the triangle inequality first for a.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top