SherlockOhms said:
Actually, I may be completely wrong here but wouldn't it actually be like this:
The first heat exchanger is a condenser, used is the one to cool the incoming air from 30C and 90% RH to 6C and 100%RH. So, this incoming air would be at a rate of 1194.74 kg/hr (Calculated earlier, yes?), then the outflows from the condenser would be liquid water at 21.7 kg/hr and (1194.74 - 21.7) kg/hr of bone dry air. The way in which you're doing it is by saying that the incoming air is at (1194.74 + 21.7) kg/hr. But, isn't the 1194.74 kg/hr the total mass flow rate in (i.e. the mass flow rate of the air/water vapour mixture at 30C and 90%RH)?
Then, wouldn't the incoming stream to the second HE(the heater used to raise the temp of the bone dry air) be at (1194.74 - 21.7) kg/hr of bone dry air seeing as the 21.7 kg of water vapour has been removed earlier by the condenser?
So, essentially, where we're differing is you're saying that the mass flow rate into the room every hour is 1194.74 kg of bone dry air, excluding the water vapour. And then, you're adding the 21.7 kg of water removed to get a total mass flow rate in.
While, what I'm saying is the mass flow rate calculated earlier, of 1194.74 kg/hr, is the total mass flow rate of the air/water vapour and the 21.7 kg/hr is the water vapour component of this. Thus, the flow rate of the bone dry air by itself is 1194.74 - 21.7 kg/hr and not 1194.74 + 21.7 kg/hr.
See what I'm saying? I could be completely incorrect though. Apologies for getting a bit sidetracked.
Well, actually, you calculated the 1194 for the 20 C air at 40% RH, which had most of the water vapor removed. That's why your instructor allowed you to us the specific volume of dry air. To get the flow rate of the air with the 30 C 90% humidity air (which enters with much more water in it), you have to add back the amount of water that condensed out.
Getting back to our calculation of the condenser heat exchanger, it is clear from the psychometric chart you sent that the datum for zero enthalpy of water for the chart is liquid water at 0 C. Note that, at 0 C on the chart, the enthalpy at 100% RH is 10 kJ/kg. This is consistent with the heat of vaporization of water at 0 C. I looked up the heat of vaporization of water at 0C, and it was about 2500 kJ/kg. From your chart, the absolute humidity of this air at 100% RH and 0 C is about 0.004 kg/kg. So, if the datum of zero enthalpy for the water were 0 C, the specific enthalpy of the air at these conditions should be (2500)(0.004)=10 kJ/kg. This confirms that the datum for zero enthalpy of water for the chart is liquid water at 0 C.
Next, let's calculate the rate at which enthalpy is exiting the condenser in the liquid stream. The heat capacity of water is 4.186 kJ/kg. So the rate is 21.7(4.186)(6 - 0) = 545 kJ/hr. We can now do the heat balance on the condenser.
Q = 25858 + 545 - 112447=-86000 kJ/hr = -86 MJ/hr
This is the rate at which heat is being removed from the gas stream (86 MJ/hr) by the condenser.
The heat of condensation/vaporization is inherently included in the enthalpies of the streams, and does not have to be accounted for separately. I know that I may have implied that this might not be the case in a previous post, but, clearly, separate accounting of the latent heat is not necessary (mia culpa).
The next thing to think about is how you might be able to save energy by using the cold gas at 6 C to precool the 30 C and 90% RH air, while, at the same time, reheating the 6C air.
Another thing to think about is how you might go about using first principles to construct a physchometric chart like this one from scratch.
Chet