How Does Immersion in Liquid Affect Body Pressure Under Acceleration?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hhhmortal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluids Pressure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores how immersion in liquid affects the pressure experienced by a human body under acceleration, considering both theoretical and practical implications. Participants examine the dynamics of pressure distribution in liquids compared to air, particularly in contexts such as aviation and potential applications in space travel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the presence of liquid increases the force experienced by a person under acceleration due to the added mass of the liquid, but the exact impact on pressure remains unclear.
  • Others discuss the role of G suits in preventing blood from pooling in the lower body during acceleration, suggesting that similar principles apply when a body is immersed in liquid.
  • A participant questions why a body, primarily composed of water, cannot distribute forces of high acceleration as effectively as the surrounding liquid does.
  • Concerns are raised about the distinction between static and dynamic pressure, with some arguing that the force distribution may differ under varying conditions.
  • One participant mentions the potential for air pressure regulation in the lungs to counteract hydrostatic pressure effects during acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints, and there is no consensus on how immersion in liquid specifically alters the pressure experienced by the body under acceleration. Multiple competing ideas and uncertainties remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in understanding the effects of pressure distribution, particularly regarding the differences between static and dynamic pressures and the implications of body tissue density compared to the immersion fluid.

hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to investigate how the force exerted onto a human body is affected by the presence of a surrounding liquid. Since the liquid can't compress the pressure is distributed in all directions. If a person is accelerated with this liquid, he/she + the mass of liquid will feel a force (F= ma).


If we consider the person alone he/she will feel a certain force due to acceleration, adding in the mass of the liquid will increase this force, so how does the liquid the person is immersed in, make a different to the pressure received by that person?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
G suits are a good example of this happening. Left to itself, a body in the seat of an aircraft in a tight curve will flatten into the seat and the blood will flow down into the leg and lower abdomen veins , starving your brain of blood and oxygen. The G suit is a strong envelope which can't distort. There is a small amount of fluid in the suit (between two shells so you don't get wet). When you go into the curve, the pressure of the liquid in the legs of the suit and lower parts of the suit balances the hydrostatic pressure in your veins so blood doesn't flow into them and away from your brain. If you were immersed in a tank of liquid, instead of a G suit, the same thing would occur.

The brain gets similar protection against knocks as it floats in a fluid inside your rigid skull.
 
sophiecentaur said:
G suits are a good example of this happening. Left to itself, a body in the seat of an aircraft in a tight curve will flatten into the seat and the blood will flow down into the leg and lower abdomen veins , starving your brain of blood and oxygen. The G suit is a strong envelope which can't distort. There is a small amount of fluid in the suit (between two shells so you don't get wet). When you go into the curve, the pressure of the liquid in the legs of the suit and lower parts of the suit balances the hydrostatic pressure in your veins so blood doesn't flow into them and away from your brain. If you were immersed in a tank of liquid, instead of a G suit, the same thing would occur.

The brain gets similar protection against knocks as it floats in a fluid inside your rigid skull.

Doesn't the fact that there is now more mass on the person mean there is a bigger force (assuming same acceleration of aircraft) directed on to him/her, hence how does pressure differ? I am not sure I am being very clear.
 
Anyone?
 
The questions don't make a whole lot of sense to me.
 
Imagine G. H. Hardy's patience with S. Ramanujan who was brilliant but un-schooled.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_breathing#Space_travel
Liquid breathing has also been proposed for use in ... space travel.
[ ... ]
Space travel

Liquid immersion provides a way to reduce the physical stress of G forces. Forces applied to fluids are distributed as omnidirectional pressures. Because liquids cannot be practically compressed, they do not change density under high acceleration such as performed in aerial maneuvers or space travel. A person immersed in liquid of the same density as tissue has acceleration forces distributed around the body, rather than applied at a single point such as a seat or harness straps. This principle is used in a new type of G-suit called the Libelle G-suit, which allows aircraft pilots to remain conscious and functioning at more than 10 G acceleration by surrounding them with water in a rigid suit.

Acceleration protection by liquid immersion is limited by the differential density of body tissues and immersion fluid, limiting the utility of this method to about 15 to 20 G.[37] Extending acceleration protection beyond 20 G requires filling the lungs with fluid of density similar to water. An astronaut totally immersed in liquid, with liquid inside all body cavities, will feel little effect from extreme G forces because the forces on a liquid are distributed equally, and in all directions simultaneously. However effects will be felt because of density differences between different body tissues, so an upper acceleration limit still exists.

Liquid breathing for acceleration protection may never be practical because of the difficulty of finding a suitable breathing medium of similar density to water that is compatible with lung tissue. Perfluorocarbon fluids are twice as dense as water, hence unsuitable for this application[38]. On the other hand, although perfluorochemicals are denser than water, lung tissue floats within the PFC filled lungs, and if the lungs are not over-filled, there is no compromise in pulmonary or systemic blood flow[39]. Therefore, if the astronaut is immersed in liquid and their lungs are filled with liquid PFC, they should not experience adverse effects, in spite of the almost twofold density difference. Based on interviews with adult patients that experienced partial liquid ventilation, when they became conscious they were unaware that 20-30 ml/kg of PFC was in their lungs during recovery.
 
Last edited:
Doug Huffman said:
Imagine G. H. Hardy's patience with S. Ramanujan who was brilliant but un-schooled.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liquid_breathing#Space_travel

Yes I had already read this. I guess the question is simply if the body is mainly composed of water then why can't it distribute the forces of high acceleration as omnidirectional pressures just as water does?
 
Since the liquid can't compress the pressure

But how can a liquid compress pressure?
so how does the liquid the person is immersed in, make a different to the pressure received by that person?

It will increase. The liquid has to get normal reaction from somewhere and it will be the dude inside the fluid.

And it's static pressure which distributes itself, here it's dynamic pressure...so the force won't distribute.
 
With lungs full of air, the thorax can collapse under the hydrostatic pressure until the pressure equalises. Blood (and even soft tissue) from the head - or whatever other bits were 'above' the lungs will tend to flow downwards - pushing the lower bits of the lung upwards.
There is no difference between static and this "dynamic" pressure you mention because the timescale is much longer than any other time constants in the system.
I would imagine that, under moderate g forces, an air pressure regulator system could 'blow' air into the lungs to maintain their volume. This is, in effect, what SCUBA valves do and they can operate under quite extreme conditions. You would probably need a tube to bypass the epiglottis, though, to avoid all the problems which divers can encounter when they don't breathe out whilst coming up.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
17K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K