How Does InSight Distinguish Marsquakes from Meteor Impacts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RJ Emery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identification
AI Thread Summary
The InSight Lander on Mars detects marsquake signals, which need to be distinguished from meteor impacts due to Mars' lack of a significant atmosphere. NASA has experience analyzing moonquakes to differentiate between seismic activity and impacts, as both Mars and the Moon share geological characteristics such as the absence of plate tectonics and active volcanism. The seismic signatures of quakes differ from those of impacts, allowing scientists to identify the origin of the signals. Any significant impact that generates a planet-wide seismic signature would likely create a crater, which could be observed by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, monitoring surface changes on Mars. Despite some similarities, the interior compositions of Mars and the Moon differ, meaning not all lunar observations can be directly applied to Martian geology.
RJ Emery
Messages
114
Reaction score
6
Every day the Earth is bombarded with meteors both large and small, most disintegrating in the atmosphere. A few strike the surface. Mars has no significant atmosphere. Thus, how is the marsquake signal detected by the InSight Lander distinguished from a true marsquake versus a meteor impact somewhere else on the Martian surface?

http://www.sci-news.com/space/insight-first-marsquake-07122.html
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Good question. I assume the signals from an impact event are different from geologic activity, but I'd like to know as well.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Agreed. That may take some help from @davenn and others...
 
  • Like
Likes davenn
Greetings @RJ Emery

Welcome to PF :smile:

RJ Emery said:
Every day the Earth is bombarded with meteors both large and small, most disintegrating in the atmosphere. A few strike the surface. Mars has no significant atmosphere. Thus, how is the marsquake signal detected by the InSight Lander distinguished from a true marsquake versus a meteor impact somewhere else on the Martian surface?

http://www.sci-news.com/space/insight-first-marsquake-07122.html
This is the good bit from that article ...

“The Sol 128 event is exciting because its size and longer duration fit the profile of moonquakes detected on the lunar surface during NASA’s Apollo missions,” said Dr. Lori Glaze, Planetary Science Division director at NASA Headquarters.

Fortunately NASA/JPL have had many years of experience of recording and analysing moonquakes to determine the differences between
actual quakes and meteorite impacts and because the geology of Mars will be sort of similar to the Moon ...eg. no plate tectonics,
no known current active volcanism or oceans, therefore the types of quakes detected will likely to be quite similar.
Tho there are still unanswered questions :wink:

Here is some more info on them from my own www site that I posted so many years ago...
http://www.sydneystormcity.com/moonqk.htm
and a .pdf file with good info...
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2004/pdf/2093.pdf
Basically they discovered differences in the seismic signatures of quakes compared to impacts when analysing the seismogramscheers
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc, BillTre, berkeman and 3 others
The interior compositions of the Moon and Mars are dissimilar. Thus, observational experience with the Moon is not necessarily transferable to Mars. Nevertheless, any impact on the surface sufficiently large to create a planet-wide seismic signature would probably leave a crater, to be eventually detected by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which is continually searching for surface changes.
 
RJ Emery said:
The interior compositions of the Moon and Mars are dissimilar.
not completely ... they are both thought to be cold ... that single fact makes a big similarity between them
RJ Emery said:
Thus, observational experience with the Moon is not necessarily transferable to Mars.
well, if you read the papers you will find that there are things that are transferrable

RJ Emery said:
Nevertheless, any impact on the surface sufficiently large to create a planet-wide seismic signature would probably leave a crater, to be eventually detected by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, which is continually searching for surface changes.

hmmm, you really didn't read any of the info did you :frown:

I gave you some insight into what they saw and you completely dismissed itDave
 
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...

Similar threads

Back
Top