How does kinetic friction affect a spinning body?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effects of kinetic friction on a spinning body, specifically a rotating cylinder with a moment of inertia of 1.5 and an initial speed of 10 rad/sec. The force of friction, calculated using the formula F_f = μ_k F_N, where μ_k is the coefficient of kinetic friction (0.5) and F_N is the normal force (5 Newtons), plays a crucial role in deceleration. Participants emphasize the importance of applying Newton's second law for rotational motion to determine the time required for the cylinder to stop, highlighting the relationship between torque, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law for rotational motion
  • Familiarity with the concept of torque and moment of inertia
  • Knowledge of kinetic friction and its calculation
  • Basic principles of angular kinematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculation of torque in rotational systems
  • Learn about angular momentum and its relationship to linear momentum
  • Explore the implications of using different units in physics calculations
  • Investigate the effects of varying coefficients of friction on rotational motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating bodies and the effects of friction on motion.

Gmaximus
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
For example, there is a rotating cylinder with a moment of intertia of 1.5, a speed of 10 rad/sec and a force perpendicular to the rim of 5 Newtons and they have a kinetic friction coeffecient of .5.

How long does it take to stop?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gmaximus,

Please post homework help problems here, in the Homework Help forum.

Coefficients of friction always relate normal force (force perpendicular to a surface) to lateral force (force across the surface of an object due to the friction).

In this case you have a 5N normal force and a 0.5 coefficient of friction, so the force due to friction is:

F_f = \mu_k F_N

Where F_f is the force due to the friction and F_N is the normal force.

Just do that multiplication to find the force (due to friction) that's slowing down the cylinder. Once you have that force, you can use the angular form of Newton's second law to find the acceleration:

\tau = I\alpha[/tex]<br /> <br /> where \tau is the torque due to the friction force, I is the moment of inertia, and \alpha is the angular acceleration.<br /> <br /> Then you can just use standard kinematics to find the time it takes the acceleration \alpha to dissipate the initial velocity of 10 rad/sec.<br /> <br /> Let me know if you need any more help.<br /> <br /> - Warren
 
Welcome to PF!

Our policy here is for you to present your work so we can see where you are getting stuck. (We don't do the work for you! :smile: )

Here's a hint to get you started: Find the torque due to the frictional force, then apply Newton's 2nd law (for rotational motion).
 
Homework? I laugh at the thought. School hasn't started yet :-p

I was just never taught how friction works with stuff that's rotating, and it was bugging me.

So, the only force slowing down the rotation is the force of friction?

If the answer is yes, then that is fantastic.


On a related note does L=P (Angular vs Linear momentum?) or is it L=PR (R=radius)?
 
Last edited:
It just doesn't make sense that the force of friction is affected by the moment arm...


Lastly: Do all measurements of length have to be in m?
 
Last edited:
Definition of angular momentum:

\mathbf{L} = \mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{p}

The force of friction does not depend on the moment arm -- it depends only on the normal force and the coefficient of friction.

The torque resulting from that friction force depends on the moment arm, however, because

\mathbf{\tau} = \mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{F}

- Warren
 
Ok... thanks a lot. You are awesome.

Will the kinematics give me a wrong answer if i use cm instead of m?
 
And no, you can use whatever units of length you want, so long as you are consistent. In other words, if you want to use feet, you have to change your unit of force (because the Newton is defined in terms of meters) and so on.

All in all, I'd recommend never using anything other than SI units in physics problems unless there's some specific overriding reason.

- Warren
 
Do you mean this equation?

\omega = \omega_0 + \alpha t

There are no units of length in this equation -- the angular velocity is in rad/sec, and the acceleration is in rad/sec2.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K