How does Le Chatelier's Principle work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alingy1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle Work
AI Thread Summary
Le Chatelier's Principle states that if a system at equilibrium experiences a change in pressure, concentration, or temperature, the equilibrium will shift to counteract that change. A key point discussed is that reactions favoring fewer molecules can lead to a decrease in pressure as the system seeks to re-establish equilibrium. However, there is a debate about whether the kinetic energy of the remaining molecules changes, suggesting that while there may be fewer collisions, each collision could exert more force. The discussion emphasizes the nuances of equilibrium reactions versus non-equilibrium reactions. Understanding these principles is crucial for predicting the behavior of chemical systems under various conditions.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
It is said that if there is a change in pressure in an equilibrium state, the chemical reactions that diminish the number of molecules will be favorised. Therefore, there will be less molecules, so the pressure will decrease to reach equilibrium again.

However, since the kinetic energy of the molecules doesn't change before and after the reactions, if there are less molecules, those molecules will be slower but heavier. So, according to me, the pressure wouldn't change because the collisions will be less but each collision will apply more force.

What do you think about that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect you have slightly misstated the principle:
If a chemical system at equilibrium experiences a change in concentration, temperature, volume, or partial pressure, then the equilibrium shifts to counteract the imposed change and a new equilibrium is established.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Chatelier's_principle

... that makes sense since it is an equilibrium reaction that is being considered.
It is possible to have reactions that are not equilibrium reactions.

Per your example - the details depend on how the pressure is changed.
 
alingy1 said:
the kinetic energy of the molecules doesn't change before and after the reactions

It doesn't?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top