How Does Linear Drag Affect a Baseball's Trajectory?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the trajectory of a baseball affected by linear drag, with specific parameters including an initial speed of 165 ft/sec and a drag coefficient of 0.38. The equations provided for the x and y coordinates involve exponential decay due to drag and gravitational effects. The user expresses difficulty in eliminating the time variable from the equations to find a vector form for the baseball's path. Another participant suggests that eliminating the parameter t may not be necessary for solving the problem, as the equations already serve their purpose. The user ultimately feels overwhelmed but acknowledges the need to continue with the assignment.
SYoungblood
Messages
64
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A baseball is hit at a height of 3 ft off thte ground. It leaves the bat with an initial speed of 165ft/sec, at an angle of 10 degrees from the horizontal. The linear drag coefficient is k=0.38; gravitational acceleration is 32 ft/sec^2

Homework Equations


[/B]
Find a vector form for the path of the baseball using these equations for linear drag,

x=V(sub)o/k (1- e^-kt) cos 10

y=(sub)o +V(sub)o/k (1- e^-kt) sin 10 + (g/k^2)(1- kt- e^-kt)

What is a vector form for the path of the baseball? Use only rational numbers in the expression as coefficients for the i and j vectors

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Oh my, I am lost in the sauce on this one…

x=165/0.38(1 - e^-0.38t) *cos 10 = 427.61389 (1 - e^-0.38t)

y= 3 + 165/0.38(1 - e^-0.38t)*sin10 + 32/0.1444(1 + 0.38t - e^0.38t) = 3 + 81.8627(1 - e^-0.38t)+ 221.6066(1 + 0.38t - e^0.38t)

Well, I combined the constants, but how to get rid of the t variable in the equation is something that I simply am not seeing, any and all help is appreciated.

Once I get the vector equation, then my problem asks for things I assume are fairly standard for this type of equation, time in flight, range of the hit ball, does it clear the fence z feet away. That is all fairly straightforward, but have mercy, I have never seen this drag coefficient before and this is proving a tough starting block.

SY
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The i and j position vectors (or x and y, if you prefer) are parametric equations in t. I don't think, given the nature of these equations, you can eliminate the parameter t. Besides, what purpose would elimination of the parameter serve in the solution of this problem anyway?
 
SteamKing said:
The i and j position vectors (or x and y, if you prefer) are parametric equations in t. I don't think, given the nature of these equations, you can eliminate the parameter t. Besides, what purpose would elimination of the parameter serve in the solution of this problem anyway?

That was a thought that crossed my mind, and the only purpose I can see was that it answered the question on my homework. All the followup problems stem from it.

I think I will just write this off as a loss and drive on.

Thanks just the same,

SY
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K