How Does Mass Distort Spacetime?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jlorino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spacetime
jlorino
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
ok if gravity is mass distorting spacetime then how does mass distort it like a bowling ball on a rubber membrane?
i would think it would need something to pull it down :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jlorino said:
ok if gravity is mass distorting spacetime then how does mass distort it like a bowling ball on a rubber membrane?
i would think it would need something to pull it down :confused:

LOL, it's an analogy so it's lacking the precise nuances you're looking for. I personally don't believe we humans are equipped to visualize (in 3D) the warping of 4D spacetime. The same way stick figures can't comprehend a sphere...they can glance it with a series of circles that grow, then shrink, but they can't think or visualize in 3D.

The bowling ball analogy uses gravity (the ball pulling the membrane down) to define gravity. Don't get caught up in the analogy, just revel in the evidence that supports the theory. :D
 
ok but what are the factors that warp spacetime?
 
I personally think that it's a mistake to interpret gravity as being identical to spacetime, and thus mass as deforming spacetime just as the analogous case where a bowling ball bends a rubber sheet. I think then we're basically talking about container space (a legacy of Newtonian physics) and one thing that general relativity shows, I believe, is that spacetime does not contain massive objects.

Remember that the gravitational field couples universally since it is generated, and effects, massive objects. Every object we can empirically experience has mass (mass-energy) so every object generates, and is influenced by, a gravitational force. Because of this, we can then use the gravitational field to define relative distances and relative acceleration. These relative distances and relative accelerations come in the form of the metric.

So gravity is not identical with spacetime. Gravity constitutes spacetime. What we perceive to be spacetime is a phenomenological manifestation of the gravitational field.

So why do we "perceive" spacetime to be warped? Because that is the way the gravitational field propagates.
 
o ok i get it now
i was just reading "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene
and had a question

thanx
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top