How Does Momentum Conserve When a Biker Hits the Pavement?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the conservation of momentum in the context of a biker colliding with the pavement. It explores whether the Earth can be considered stationary during this collision and how to quantify momentum conservation in such a system. The participants clarify that while the biker's momentum can be analyzed, the Earth's massive size means its velocity change is negligible. Additionally, the kinetic energy of the biker is transformed into heat, sound, and deformation upon impact. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of analyzing momentum in collisions involving significantly different masses.
MattsVai
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I have a fundamental question regarding conservation of momentum (not homework).

So if we have a system of 2 balls, identical in size and weight, one of which is initially stationary until hit by the other ball. We have the following:

m1v1 + 0 = 0 + m2v2

or v2 = v1

and therefore there is conservation of momentum. Now what happens when say a biker hits the pavement with his helmet... how does momentum conserve? Is this a system of Earth vs bikers head? How can I quantify the conservation of momentum? having a hard time understanding...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MattsVai said:
So if we have a system of 2 balls, identical in size and weight, one of which is initially stationary until hit by the other ball. We have the following:

m1v1 + 0 = 0 + m2v2

or v2 = v1
Note that this is only true in a head on collision i.e. one dimensional case, in general both balls will have a non zero velocity after the collision.
MattsVai said:
Now what happens when say a biker hits the pavement with his helmet... how does momentum conserve? Is this a system of Earth vs bikers head? How can I quantify the conservation of momentum? having a hard time understanding...
The system would be the biker (not just his head) and the earth. What do you mean your having hard time quantifying conservation of momentum?
 
Hi Hootenanny, thanks for the reply :)

So basically how do I demonstrate conservation of momentum for a system in which there is collision between a biker and pavement (earth)? Is it safe to consider the Earth as stationary given that it has rotational and translational movements? What happens to the kinetic energy of the biker once he hits the pavement... where does that energy go?

Cheers
 
not really the same case is here, because mass of Earth and of helmet is not same therefore velocity would differ.
 
MattsVai said:
Hi Hootenanny, thanks for the reply :)
No problem :smile:
MattsVai said:
So basically how do I demonstrate conservation of momentum for a system in which there is collision between a biker and pavement (earth)? Is it safe to consider the Earth as stationary given that it has rotational and translational movements?
You can consider that Earth stationary before the collision and just consider the velocity of the biker (which for the sake of simplicity we can model as a particle). After the collision however, you must consider the velocity of both the Earth and the biker. You can ignore the rotational momentum of both the biker and the Earth as this is not going to significantly affect the result. To be honest this calculation is going to produce a very small change in velocity for the earth, so I don't know how accurate this is going to be.
MattsVai said:
What happens to the kinetic energy of the biker once he hits the pavement... where does that energy go?
The kinetic energy is dissapated as heat, sound, deformation of helmet etc.
 
Makes sense :)

Thanks for the input Hootenanny.

All the best!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top