How Does Non-Linear FEA Work After Applying a Force?

AI Thread Summary
Non-linear finite element analysis (FEA) involves applying a force to a structure and analyzing its response, which becomes non-linear due to material behavior like elastoplasticity. The Newton-Raphson method is employed to iteratively linearize the system response until convergence is achieved, with each iteration checking the difference between internal and external forces, known as the residual. This process requires the stiffness matrix to adapt based on the displacement field, leading to a non-linear relationship in the equations. Convergence criteria often involve comparing the norm of the residual force vector to the external force vector. Understanding these principles is crucial for effectively applying non-linear FEA in structural mechanics.
chandran
Messages
137
Reaction score
1
How non linear fea works. I am studying that and i can't find any material in the web which has some basics.

How the Newton raphson method is used in non linear fea

suppose i apply a force f on a structure after that how non linear fea works?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
About the Newton-Raphson method ... you can view it as a generalization of Newton's method, where in this case the system response is sequentially linearized until convergence (the modified version classically doesn't update the coefficient matrix). Below a link about the method and FE solvers. So what you do in structural applications when your force - displacement response in nonlinear you linearize it sequentially until you've reached a convergent solution (typically e.g. using force residual/norm criteria).

http://www.aaue.dk/bm/ansys/b8km-fe05.pdf
http://uranus.ee.auth.gr/lessons/1/10.html
 
Last edited:
What is meant by a residual? How non linear works?

In each iteration what is checked against what? and why it is checked?
 
The nonlinearities were touched in general here :

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=74375

... to elaborate, when we're considering a typical structural mechanics problem, nonlinearity e.g. in material behavior (such as elastoplasticity) reflects upon the load - displacement response of the structure. The curve is no longer linear, and thus no longer follows from e.g. Hookean material behavior, but becomes nonlinear. In the FEA equations this will appear similarly as nonlinearities usually do, the stiffness matrix becoming nonlinear and dependent on the displacement field (i.e. the solution itself).

Because of this coupling, within the numerical process the solution needs to be established iteratively, meaning that you solve the problem by successive approximations forming a (hopefully) convergent series. The difference between two iterations is referred to as the 'residual', to which there are generally different measures and criteria. If we stay in the context of the Newton-Raphson method, the residual of force is usually defined by comparing the external and internal force vectors at a specific node (typically different implementations have different convergence criteria, commonly the norm of the residual force vector is compared to the norm of the external force vector and required to be a small fraction of it).
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top